499 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 25
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 10, 2008
Ford Motor Company v. Miller (2008)
The Texas Court of Appeals reversed the $10,000,000 jury verdict and rendered judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller and that John Roland had no compensable injury or…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017
Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
The Court of Appeals vacated the $3.4 million judgment for Joyce and Ronnie Stockton against Ford Motor Company and remanded, because the jury instructions and verdict form omitted required questions on whether the product was…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · January 18, 2013
Smith v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
The district court granted Ford Motor Company's motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert, Dr. Samuel Hammar, finding his "every exposure" causation opinion inadmissible, which went against plaintiff Linda Smith. An expert's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
The court denied Ford Motor Company's motion to reconsider the earlier partial denial of summary judgment, so Plaintiff Laura Walls's claims against Ford remained pending. A district court may revisit interlocutory rulings under Rule…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 14, 2014
Durham v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
…judgment and partial summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on both the plaintiff's appeal and Ford's cross-appeal, rejecting the Durham estate's premises and products claims and Ford's request for total immunity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
Laura Walls sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants individually and as executor of the estate of her husband, Robie Walls. She claimed his death from mesothelioma was wrongful. The opinion does not describe where or…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 26, 2014
Scott v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
The court affirmed the judgment and compensatory damages for Patrick and Sharon Scott against Ford Motor Co. on the failure to warn claims, and reversed the ruling that barred punitive damages, remanding for a trial on…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 22, 2019
Ford Motor Company v. Sheets (2019)
…trial court's one-sentence order denying Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion and remanded for the trial court to state the basis for its ruling, leaving Ford's up-the-ladder immunity claim undecided…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · October 16, 2006
McPhee v. Ford Motor Company (2006)
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Ford Motor Company, rejecting Marvin McPhee's claim over his wife Elaine's fatal mesothelioma because his medical expert's declaration contradicted his deposition and was too conclusory…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007
Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)
The Court of Appeal reversed the summary judgments for Ford Motor Company and Merck & Co. and remanded with directions to deny both motions, so plaintiff Eileen Honer prevailed on appeal. Under Code of Civil Procedure section…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
… Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation Worksites: Archie Motors Freight; Great Coastal Express; Archie's and Adley tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Archie Motors Freight 1964-1972; tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Great Coastal Express 1962-1964…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011
Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdict and judgment for Ford Motor Company against the Rehm family, and held Ford's cross-appeal moot while addressing its merits. Evidence rulings are reviewed for abuse of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 30, 2023
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2023)
The court denied Ford's renewed motion for directed verdict, granted its motion to amend the judgment so that $6,888,500 in settlements offset the $275,000 verdict, interest and costs (leaving $0 owed), and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…Crane was fraudulently joined, so Ford Motor Company's removal to federal court stood. A non-diverse defendant dismissed by involuntary summary judgment may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020
Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the judgment for Ford Motor Company after retrial, rejecting the Coates estate's challenges to the denial of partial summary judgment, the denial of a new trial, and the refusal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…the Michel plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second supplemental and amended complaint adding Ford Leasing Development Company, LLC as a defendant, over Ford Motor Company's opposition. Where a scheduling order deadline has passed…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment for plaintiff Honer (continued by her daughter Mary Campbell) against Ford, holding Ford owed her no duty, so Ford prevailed. Under the Rowland factors as clarified in Cabral, an…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…so Ford Motor Company keeps its award of costs including $167,570 in expert witness fees after its defense verdict. A prevailing defendant's section 998 offer is presumed reasonable when it wins a more favorable…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 28, 2018
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
The court granted Cummins's and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' experts Dr. Brody and Dr. Castleman for late disclosure of their reports and denied plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order. Under Rule 37…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · April 24, 2007
State EX rel. Ford Motor Company v. Nixon (2007)
…of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford Motor Company Claycomo assembly plant; Ford automotive plant in Claycomo, Claycomo worked at the Ford automotive plant Ford automotive plant in Claycomo Claycomo over thirty years until 1996