33 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and judgment as a matter of law for Ford and DCo, so the Jacks lost on all claims. Under Washington law, a take-home exposure claim…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…the brands of brakes he worked on at Dexter, Mr. Jack testified that "\[s\]ome of them \[were\] Ford." (Id. at 131:17-20.) When Plaintiffs' counsel asked Mr. Jack if he used the arc grinder …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
Twenty-two plaintiffs, all represented by the same lawyers, sued more than eighty defendants in New York County for asbestos-related injuries or deaths. Seven had lung cancer, fourteen had pleural mesothelioma, and Glenda Vega had peritoneal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC; GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP., formerly known as R AYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…Cal.App.4th at p. 19, the plaintiff filed a premises liability action against Ford Motor Company, alleging that she contracted mesothelioma as a result of her secondary exposure to asbestos, which occurred when she shook…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…DEHAY & ELLISTON LLP, pro hac vice, Michael J. Madderra, BENNETT BIGELOW & LEEDOM & Richard D. Ross, BENNETT BIGELOW & LEEDOM. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Harry S. Johnson, WHITEFORD TAYLOR PRESTON LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel K…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Abex Corp. (2015)
…494, 709 A.2d 139 (Md. 1998) (involving asbestos-containing replacement brakes used with motor vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company). Because the issue is on appeal, the Court has not considered Maryland state law as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)
…2019 WL 2150949, at [\6] (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2019) (emphasis in original) (citation omitted); see also Pierson v. Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 7074289, at [\2] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008). The Court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…applying Maryland law and finding no duty); In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Court of Appeals of Texas (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 740 N.W.2d 206, 218 (Mich. 2007) (applying Michigan law and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)
…a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · November 20, 2018 · in the opinion
Little v. Budd Company (2018)
…the total dose" which "is an \irrefutable scientific fact,' and it is \well-established' that the threshold level for developing mesothelioma is unknown." Id. (quoting Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1045 (Pa…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…of products liability" it is unsettled whether the consumer-expectation test, risk-utility test or both should be applied in evaluating an alleged defect. Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106-07 (Fla…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 2, 2022 · in the opinion
English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)
…Shulton pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), which applies by its terms, and that the exercise of jurisdiction over Shulton is also compatible with due process (see Ford Motor Co. v Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)
…SBRMCOA, LLC v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 707 F.3d 267, 272-73 (3d Cir.2013) (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277, 284-85 (3d Cir. 1991)). In this case…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)
…230 (1966). See also Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muething, 65 Ohio St.3d 273, 278-279 (1992); Vidensek v. Ford Motor Co., 9th Dist. Medina No. 2120-M, 1992 WL 393171, [\2] (Dec. 30, 1992)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 2004 · in the opinion
Goede v. Aerojet General Corporation (2004)
…501 (Mo.App. W.D. 1991); Rinker v. Ford Motor Co., 567 S.W.2d 655, 660(Mo.App. 1978). Lastly, Aerojet complains that in awarding lump-sum damages without assigning any amounts to any particular…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)
…materials. Neither the Havers' nor Kesner's suit reached a jury. Abex moved for nonsuit at the beginning of trial in light of Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell)…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion
Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)
…BUDD COMPANY, CATERPILLAR, INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, CONTINENTAL TEVES, INC., DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXO SUPPLY COMPANY, FORD CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC…