No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

119 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 6

  1. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 14, 2014

    Durham v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    …judgment and partial summary judgment for Ford Motor Company on both the plaintiff's appeal and Ford's cross-appeal, rejecting the Durham estate's premises and products claims and Ford's request for total immunity…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The Court of Special Appeals vacated the judgments for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company and remanded for a new trial, because the trial court should not have admitted the plaintiffs' expert's causation opinion…

  3. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011

    Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdict and judgment for Ford Motor Company against the Rehm family, and held Ford's cross-appeal moot while addressing its merits. Evidence rulings are reviewed for abuse of…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · July 15, 2020

    Coates v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the judgment for Ford Motor Company after retrial, rejecting the Coates estate's challenges to the denial of partial summary judgment, the denial of a new trial, and the refusal…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012

    Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment for plaintiff Honer (continued by her daughter Mary Campbell) against Ford, holding Ford owed her no duty, so Ford prevailed. Under the Rowland factors as clarified in Cabral, an…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011

    Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …so Ford Motor Company keeps its award of costs including $167,570 in expert witness fees after its defense verdict. A prevailing defendant's section 998 offer is presumed reasonable when it wins a more favorable…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Exxon Mobil, Ford and Rossmoor, rejecting plaintiffs' challenges to the summary adjudication for Exxon, the nonsuit for Rossmoor, the jury instructions on Ford, and the defense verdict for Exxon. An…

  8. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 31, 2019

    Knecht v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    The Delaware Superior Court denied Ford Motor Company's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, its alternative motion for a new trial, and its motion for a new trial or remittitur, leaving the…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    …of Special Appeals reversed the judgment for Mrs. Wood against Ford Motor Company for insufficient proof that her husband was exposed to Ford's brake and clutch products, and affirmed the judgment for the Grewe plaintiffs…

  10. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …Island Superior Court denied summary judgment to Ford Motor Company and to Graybar Electric Company, so the estate's claims against both go forward, and it also denied Ford's motion for partial entry of separate…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    Robert Reaser served in the Navy from 1951 to 1971, working as a pipefitter and welder on Navy vessels, including time in San Diego and Long Beach. He later lived in Florida and worked in construction and on automobiles. He was diagnosed with…

  12. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010

    Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    Carlie Asbury, diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2006, and her husband Thomas sued thirty defendants in Rhode Island Superior Court in 2007. They alleged she was exposed to asbestos in Iowa, Colorado and Wyoming. In Iowa she swept dust and debris in…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019

    Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)

    …without prejudice to renewal at trial; Ford's motion was marked withdrawn. Conflicting expert reports on whether exposure caused lung cancer raise credibility issues that cannot be resolved on summary judgment. The court deferred ruling on…

  14. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    …judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018

    Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the judgments for Coates against Mack Trucks and Ford on negligent failure to warn, and reversed the judgments for CertainTeed on Mack's and Ford's cross-claims, remanding for…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)

    James Waite lived in Massachusetts, where he was exposed to asbestos while renovating apartments in the late 1960s. The opinion says the joint compound he used contained asbestos mined and sold by Union Carbide. He moved to Florida in 1978,…

  18. Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002

    Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)

    The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…

  19. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 2018

    Chen v. Volkswagen Group of America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …North America's motions for summary judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied the forum non conveniens motions of those two companies and Ford, so plaintiffs kept their New York forum. A New York court…