No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

24 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …hazard of the occupational disease." Here, Bill alleged that his last occupational exposure occurred while he worked for Ford Motor Company from 1978 until 2002. The second is the applicable statute of repose. Prior to 1986…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …("Consolidated Aluminum") (id. ¶ 6); (v) Dana Companies LLC, sued both individually, and, as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company ("Dana") (id. ¶ 7); (vi) Ford Motor Company ("Ford") (id. ¶ 8); and (vii) Unilever United States…

  3. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Backe v. AW Kuettel & Sons, Inc. (2020)

    …Ct. 916 (2020). The plaintiff was injured in a car accident in Minnesota in a 1994 Ford vehicle and filed a complaint against defendant Ford Motor Company asserting claims for products liability, negligence, and breach of…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …Vandermark held that the lower court erred in granting a nonsuit on the plaintiff's claim that Ford Motor Company (Ford) could not be strictly liable for a product defect simply because it relied on its…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)

    …Inc. ("Consolidated Aluminum"); (v) Dana Companies LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company ("Dana"); (vi) Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); (vii) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"); (viii) TVA; and (ix) Unilever…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)

    …Inc. ("Consolidated Aluminum"); (v) Dana Companies LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company ("Dana"); (vi) Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); (vii) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"); (viii) TVA; and (ix) Unilever…

  7. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …Defendants appeal the trial court's ruling only with respect to the following 16 nonparty entities: Georgia Power Company ("Georgia Power"); Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); Genuine Parts Company ("Genuine Parts"); Chrysler LLC ("Chrysler"); General Motors ("GM")…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …v. A-C Prods. Liab. Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492-93 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378, at [\1]-3 (D. Utah Jan. 18, 2014)…

  9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)

    …238, 242 (4th Cir. 1971) (finding that the duty-to-warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product))); see Watson v. Ford Motor Co., 389 S.C. 434, 444, 699…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Co. (2014)

    …a substantial factor causing an injury. Id., 177 Ill.Dec. 379, 603 N.E.2d at 455-57. Cf. Ford Motor [\920] Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141, 736 S.E.2d 724, 729-30 (2013)…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …Manufacturing Company products.\[1\] When considering a "no evidence," "insufficient evidence," or "against the great weight and preponderance" point of error, we will follow the well-established test set forth in Pool v. Ford Motor Co…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …paying compensatory damages rather than changing the business practice which would result in extra costs. See, e.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437, 451-457 (1980); Sturm…

  14. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)

    …exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Collantes v. Elementis Chemicals, Inc. (2020)

    …Familian Corp. (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 969, 979 (Turley).) "\If there has been no exposure, there is no causation.'" (Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co. (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 261, 289; see Izell v. Union…

  16. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)

    …exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion

    Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)

    …fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …to individuals who lived or worked some distance away from its plant, citing to Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), a case that was later overruled by Kesner v. Superior…

  19. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Aubin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)

    …in section 402A of the Second Restatement. Id. at 155. In making this determination, the Fourth District relied on Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), which held that "\…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 2, 2021 · in the opinion

    Neely EX rel. Estate OF Goehring v. Union Carbide Corporation (2021)

    …record indicates that the Union Carbide products at issue contained chrysotile fibers, but none of the attached studies specifically looked at that type of fiber. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841…