19 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
Twenty-two plaintiffs, all represented by the same lawyers, sued more than eighty defendants in New York County for asbestos-related injuries or deaths. Seven had lung cancer, fourteen had pleural mesothelioma, and Glenda Vega had peritoneal…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996 · in the opinion
Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)
…is to apply the law of the state with the most significant contacts. Lee v. Ford Motor Company, supra. \ \ \ \ \ \ \[If\] a true conflict exists, the second step is to determine which state has the most significant…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 2, 2024 · in the opinion
Wagner v. Aerco Intl., Inc. (2024)
…ELECTRIC CORPORATION, DCO LLC F/K/A DANA COMPANIES, LLC, DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., EATON CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN- INTEREST TO CUTLER-HAMMER, INC, ECHLIN INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOODYEAR CANADA…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Benicia Pump Repair Benicia 1950s-1980s; helper in boiler and furnace removal and installation stepfather's boiler and furnace business 1950s; worker at a construction products company 1970s; handyman 1970s and 1980s; union carpenter various construction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)
…formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)
…238, 242 (4th Cir. 1971) (finding that the duty-to-warn arises when the user may not realize the potential danger of a product))); see Watson v. Ford Motor Co., 389 S.C. 434, 444, 699…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
…1965). \[44\] RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: LIABILITY FOR PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL HARM § 26 (2010). \[45\] See id. § 26 cmt. j. \[46\] 232 S.W.3d at 772. \[47\] Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. 141…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 12, 2023 · in the opinion
Finello v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2023)
…fibers. We agree with Tragarz Court's approach and adopt it here. Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Company, 943 A.2d at 225-226. In Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)
…to individuals who lived or worked some distance away from its plant, citing to Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15 (Campbell), a case that was later overruled by Kesner v. Superior…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
…232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 12, 2021 · in the opinion
Faivor v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2021)
…12, 2021. Supreme Court, Suffolk County. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, 700 Broadway, New York, New York 10003, Attorney for Plaintiffs. LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C., 1617 JFK Boulevard, Suite 955, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attorney for Defendant DAP…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008
State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)
…Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' mandamus grant and held that the Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in naming Pilkington, successor to Libbey Owens Ford's self-insured claims, as the amenable employer…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007
State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)
…and Settlement Credits Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant; Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane Plant 9), Rossford laborer, furnace tender, and crew leader Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · July 22, 2016
Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2016)
…crossclaim, and a summary judgment motion filed before discovery begins is premature. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford plant, Shreveport; Libbey-Owens-Ford (LOF) Plant, Shreveport Libbey-Owens-Ford (LOF) Plant Shreveport
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017
Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)
…Libbey-Owens-Ford plant, Shreveport; Libbey-Owens-Ford (LOF) Plant, Shreveport, Shreveport worked throughout the LOF Plant Libbey-Owens-Ford (LOF) Plant, Shreveport Shreveport 1962-1971; father employed in the Packing Department Libbey-Owens-Ford (LOF…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 17, 2022 · in the opinion
Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2022)
…bankruptcy protection. See Hanlon at 668 ("In the late 1980s, premises cases began to be brought against electric utilities, and in the 1990s they extended to other kinds of companies, including paper mills, steel mills, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
…under N.Y.Labor Law § 200 to warn those lawfully on the premises of hidden dangers of which it knew or should have known. Gasperino v. Larsen Ford, Inc., 300 F.Supp. 1182 (S.D.N…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)
…For purposes of considering whether Brown had exhausted his administrative remedies, this case was brought on June 1, 2010. See Ford v. Johnson, 362 F.3d 395 (7th Cir. 2004)(holding that a prisoner "brought suit"…