43 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 10, 2008
Ford Motor Company v. Miller (2008)
The Texas Court of Appeals reversed the $10,000,000 jury verdict and rendered judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller and that John Roland had no compensable injury or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · February 28, 2014
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)
Joseph Anderson Jr. sued in state court, and the case was removed to federal court in Utah. He alleged asbestos-caused mesothelioma and died of it in 2008. His wife Arva Anderson, as executor, took over as plaintiff. After the case returned from the…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…appeals court in the negative, holding that Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller, which favored Ford and went against the Miller plaintiffs' $9.5 million Texas verdict theory. Under Michigan law, a duty depends on…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…Singewald, White & Williams. Ford Motor Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams. CBS Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Shawn Edward Martyniak, Swartz Campbell LLC. Caterpillar Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 23, 2021 · in the opinion
Brindell v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. (2021)
…death."\[128\] During oral argument, Removing Defendants cited Michel v. Ford Motor Company\[129\] and Smith v. Union Carbide\[130\] to support these arguments. When conducting a summary inquiry, the Court determines only whether the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Fiat Allis North America, Cross Defendant, represented by Peter S. Murphy, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. Ford Motor Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams. John Crane Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Jonathan…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion
West v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2005)
…Chrysler Corporation; Ferodo America, Inc., a Delaware corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Nuturn Corporation; Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors, a Delaware corporation; G.I. Joe's, an Oregon corporation; Metalclad…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015
Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)
…four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion
H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)
…(1976), 39 Ill. App.3d 59, 65-66, 349 N.E.2d 616, 621; see Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. (1975), 32 Ill. App.3d 188, 191, 336 N.E. 2d 528, 530.) In the case…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · August 12, 2008 · in the opinion
Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2008)
…reasonable probability" that emphysema was caused by employment "solely and independently of all other causes"; aggravation of existing emphysema is compensable only to extent of aggravation); Kingery v. Ford Motor Co., 116 Mich.App. 606, 619…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)
…ENGINEERING, FORD MOTOR CO., FOSECO, INC., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC., GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULD PUMPS, INC., GREEN, TWEED & COMAPNY, INC., HAJOCA PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, HARNISCHFEGER…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · November 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Deschenes v. Transco, Inc. (2007)
…reasonable probability" that emphysema was caused by employment "solely and independently of all other causes"; aggravation of existing emphysema is compensable only to extent of aggravation); Kingery v. Ford Motor Co., 116 Mich.App. 606, 619…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2016 · in the opinion
Stein v. Pfizer Inc. (2016)
…law); Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1963) (applying Texas law); Putnam v. Erie City Mfg. Co., 338 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1964) (applying Texas law); Standard Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)
…Engineering, Ford Motor Co., Foseco, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Motors Corp., George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia- Pacific Corporation, Gould Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Harnischfeger…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…gatekeeping function, a trial court must "ensure that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand." Nease v. Ford Motor Co., 848 F.3d 219, 229…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion
Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)
…unpersuaded by plaintiffs' argument. The zero damages rule conflicts with the standard of review articulated by the Texas Supreme Court in the case of Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion
Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)
…59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)
…Argument, doc. no. 141, March 2, 2010 at 93). Mr. Constantinides testified that he occasionally repaired pumps and motors by removing and replacing gaskets and bearings. (Pl. Video Dep., doc. no. 125-2, 56-59). Mr…