No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

197 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 10

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    Laura Walls sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants individually and as executor of her husband Robie Walls' estate. He died of mesothelioma in 2020. After a Navy tour from 1955 to 1959, he worked about…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 10, 2008

    Ford Motor Company v. Miller (2008)

    The Texas Court of Appeals reversed the $10,000,000 jury verdict and rendered judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller and that John Roland had no compensable injury or…

  3. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    The Court of Appeals vacated the $3.4 million judgment for Joyce and Ronnie Stockton against Ford Motor Company and remanded, because the jury instructions and verdict form omitted required questions on whether the product was…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 26, 2014

    Scott v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    The court affirmed the judgment and compensatory damages for Patrick and Sharon Scott against Ford Motor Co. on the failure to warn claims, and reversed the ruling that barred punitive damages, remanding for a trial on…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007

    Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)

    The Court of Appeal reversed the summary judgments for Ford Motor Company and Merck & Co. and remanded with directions to deny both motions, so plaintiff Eileen Honer prevailed on appeal. Under Code of Civil Procedure section…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    … Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation Worksites: Archie Motors Freight; Great Coastal Express; Archie's and Adley tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Archie Motors Freight 1964-1972; tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Great Coastal Express 1962-1964…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)

    The court denied Ford's and Cummins's motions to exclude or limit the expert testimony of Dr. Staggs, Dr. Finkelstein and Christopher Depasquale, so the plaintiffs' experts may testify. An expert's specific-causation opinion…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …s specific-causation expert, Dr. Kradin, and then granted summary judgment to Ford Motor Company and Pneumo Abex LLC, ruling against the estate's representative, Stacey Doolin. Under Daubert and Eleventh Circuit precedent, an expert's…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …the intermediate appellate court, reinstated the jury verdicts for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company, and reversed the trial court's judgment for Ford on its cross-claim against Georgia-Pacific, which won back the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …the Michel plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second supplemental and amended complaint adding Ford Leasing Development Company, LLC as a defendant, over Ford Motor Company's opposition. Where a scheduling order deadline has passed…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012

    Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment for plaintiff Honer (continued by her daughter Mary Campbell) against Ford, holding Ford owed her no duty, so Ford prevailed. Under the Rowland factors as clarified in Cabral, an…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011

    Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …so Ford Motor Company keeps its award of costs including $167,570 in expert witness fees after its defense verdict. A prevailing defendant's section 998 offer is presumed reasonable when it wins a more favorable…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010

    Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the jury's liability and damages findings against Ford Motor Company, but vacated the judgment and remanded so Ford's counsel could review the settlement agreements before a new judgment was…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 28, 2018

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    The court granted Cummins's and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' experts Dr. Brody and Dr. Castleman for late disclosure of their reports and denied plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order. Under Rule 37…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …ArvinMeritor and Navistar, and loss of consortium was dismissed against Strick and Ford. Under North Carolina law, an asbestos plaintiff can show causation with direct or circumstantial evidence of regular exposure to a defendant's product…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 19, 2014

    Rost v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    The Superior Court affirmed the judgment for Richard and Joyce Rost against Ford Motor Company, rejecting Ford's appeal and the Rosts' cross-appeal. Betz v. Pneumo Abex does not bar all 'any exposure' expert opinion…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 27, 2016

    Bristol v. Ford Motor Company (2016)

    …is presumed to have acted in good faith, and the defendant did not rebut that presumption. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford dealership mechanic at a Ford dealership Ford dealership 1972-1989

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)

    The court denied Cummins Inc.'s and Ford Motor Company's joint motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs (Michel's survivors) keep their claims against both defendants. Plaintiffs must show exposure to asbestos from the…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    Laura Walls sued Ford, Pneumo Abex and other companies on behalf of the estate of her husband, Robie Walls, and for her own loss of consortium. She alleged that exposure to their asbestos-containing products caused…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Exxon Mobil, Ford and Rossmoor, rejecting plaintiffs' challenges to the summary adjudication for Exxon, the nonsuit for Rossmoor, the jury instructions on Ford, and the defense verdict for Exxon. An…