45 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Ford, Brenntag Specialties, Whittaker Clark & Daniels and Honeywell because Ratcliff's claims were time-barred, and recommended terminating the other pending motions as moot. Under North Carolina law…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
The court granted Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' alternative-causation claims with prejudice and their fraud, concealment and aiding-and-abetting conspiracy claims without prejudice, and allowed the…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015
Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)
…affirmed Ford's liability, reallocated fault to Ford 65%, Union Carbide 25% and Higgins 10%, and amended the survival damages award against Ford, so the plaintiffs lost against Southern Talc but kept their judgment against Ford…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
Twenty-two plaintiffs, all represented by the same lawyers, sued more than eighty defendants in New York County for asbestos-related injuries or deaths. Seven had lung cancer, fourteen had pleural mesothelioma, and Glenda Vega had peritoneal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC; GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP., formerly known as R AYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion
Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)
…in Burke, supra, leave no doubt that the actual knowledge standard applies to this case. See also: Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 952 F.2d 715, 740 (3d Cir.1991). Thus, to recover…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion
Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)
…Ackerman v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, 368 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.1963) \[4,5\]. W.R. Grace has successor liability for the liabilities of Zonolite. See, id.; Ernst v. Ford Motor Company, 813 S.W…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Abex Corp. (2015)
…494, 709 A.2d 139 (Md. 1998) (involving asbestos-containing replacement brakes used with motor vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Company). Because the issue is on appeal, the Court has not considered Maryland state law as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 8, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2019)
…Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020 · in the opinion
Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)
…the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that defendant Ford Motor Company's conduct was a proximate cause of the decedent's injuries pursuant to the standards set forth in \[Parker\] and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)
…2019 WL 2150949, at [\6] (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2019) (emphasis in original) (citation omitted); see also Pierson v. Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 7074289, at [\2] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008). The Court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 26, 2014 · in the opinion
Gillen v. Boeing Company (2014)
…applying Maryland law and finding no duty); In re Certified Question from Fourteenth Dist. Court of Appeals of Texas (Miller v. Ford Motor Co.), 740 N.W.2d 206, 218 (Mich. 2007) (applying Michigan law and…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 6, 2009 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Franklin (2009)
…jury trial was held against Vanderbilt and three remaining defendants, General Motors, Ford Motor, and Pneumo Abex. General Motors and Pneumo Abex settled during the trial. The jury assessed damages of $5,200,000 and allocated…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)
…a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)
…of products liability" it is unsettled whether the consumer-expectation test, risk-utility test or both should be applied in evaluating an alleged defect. Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So. 2d 103, 106-07 (Fla…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…our Supreme Court cautions against "instructions getting into evidentiary matters, subquestions which better practice suggests should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments." Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)
…regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 12, 2020 · in the opinion
Curtin v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2020)
…issue, and the Eleventh Circuit has held that "the loss of a valid statute of limitations defense \[does not\] constitute a bar to a dismissal without prejudice." McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855…