No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

33 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019

    Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Ford, Brenntag Specialties, Whittaker Clark & Daniels and Honeywell because Ratcliff's claims were time-barred, and recommended terminating the other pending motions as moot. Under North Carolina law…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)

    The court granted Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' alternative-causation claims with prejudice and their fraud, concealment and aiding-and-abetting conspiracy claims without prejudice, and allowed the…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015

    Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)

    …affirmed Ford's liability, reallocated fault to Ford 65%, Union Carbide 25% and Higgins 10%, and amended the survival damages award against Ford, so the plaintiffs lost against Southern Talc but kept their judgment against Ford…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …in Burke, supra, leave no doubt that the actual knowledge standard applies to this case. See also: Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 952 F.2d 715, 740 (3d Cir.1991). Thus, to recover…

  5. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion

    Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)

    …Ackerman v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, 368 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.1963) \[4,5\]. W.R. Grace has successor liability for the liabilities of Zonolite. See, id.; Ernst v. Ford Motor Company, 813 S.W…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)

    …Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 8, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2019)

    …Jeffrey P. Hubbard, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC & Stacey L. Strain, HUBBARD, MITCHELL, WILLIAMS & STRAIN, PLLC. Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Amber Barlow, KUCHLER, POLK, WEINER, LLC, pro hac vice, Janika D. Polk, KUCHLER POLK…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020 · in the opinion

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)

    …the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that defendant Ford Motor Company's conduct was a proximate cause of the decedent's injuries pursuant to the standards set forth in \[Parker\] and…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)

    …2019 WL 2150949, at [\6] (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2019) (emphasis in original) (citation omitted); see also Pierson v. Ford Motor Co., 2008 WL 7074289, at [\2] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008). The Court…

  10. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Franklin (2009)

    …jury trial was held against Vanderbilt and three remaining defendants, General Motors, Ford Motor, and Pneumo Abex. General Motors and Pneumo Abex settled during the trial. The jury assessed damages of $5,200,000 and allocated…

  11. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)

    …our Supreme Court cautions against "instructions getting into evidentiary matters, subquestions which better practice suggests should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments." Ford Motor Co. v…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)

    …regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 12, 2020 · in the opinion

    Curtin v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2020)

    …issue, and the Eleventh Circuit has held that "the loss of a valid statute of limitations defense \[does not\] constitute a bar to a dismissal without prejudice." McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)

    …Shulton pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1), which applies by its terms, and that the exercise of jurisdiction over Shulton is also compatible with due process (see Ford Motor Co. v Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Court…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2018)

    …the determination of whether these fees were reasonably necessary, are issues left to the discretion of the trial court." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484 \[132 Cal.Rptr.3d 424…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)

    …2:17-CV-86, 2017 WL 3033425, at [\4] (S.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) (quoting Garcia v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:12-CV-181, 2013 WL 12137090, at [\3] (S.D. Tex. May 10…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …be proper under § 1441(a) even if venue might have been improper in the state court prior to removal. Id.; see also Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (2020)

    …No. 2:13-CV-04079, 2013 WL 12155465, at [\5] (W.D. Mo. June 18, 2013); Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1] (E.D. Mo. Dec. 17, 2007…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Bader v. Avon Products, Inc. (2020)

    …Supreme Court may soon shed light on this issue in Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. (Minn. 2019) 931 N.W.2d 744, Supreme Court Minutes, January 17, 2020, certiorari granted sub nom. Ford Motor Co. v…