5 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…Cal.App.4th at p. 19, the plaintiff filed a premises liability action against Ford Motor Company, alleging that she contracted mesothelioma as a result of her secondary exposure to asbestos, which occurred when she shook…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)
…Cir. 1987); Muzzleman v. Nat. Rail Passenger Corp., 839 F.Supp. 1094, 1096-1097 (D.Del. 1993); Ford v. Nat. R. Passenger Corp., 734 F.Supp. 215 (D.Md.1990); Lyons v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion
Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)
…Special Appeals of Maryland. [\60] Harry Goldman, Jr. (Goldman, Skeen & Wadler, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellants. B. Ford Davis, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, for ACandS, Inc. Edward F. Houff, Church & Houff, P.A.…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)
…both Batson, in which the Supreme Court made it clear that a timely objection was required, and Ford, in which that Court described the approach we now adopt as "sensible," were decided before the trial. OCF…