9 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · May 18, 2023
Craig v. AW Chesterton Co. (2023)
Gloria Craig has mesothelioma. She sued many companies in Alabama state court, alleging she breathed asbestos that her ex-husband brought home on his clothes from his work as a pipefitter at Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding in Mobile in the 1970s…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)
…Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · September 29, 2015 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)
…also was the first nuclear plant to generate more than one billion watts of electric power.\[30\] The plant's three operating units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)
…units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms, and the heat generated by that process boils water, producing steam that is piped to turbines, which spin generators to produce electricity.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
The only evidence cited by plaintiff for such a proposition is general testimony that "every manufacturer has the recommended spare parts in their OEM manuals that the store room would generate their list of in-stock…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)
…\[and\] ... an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)
….. an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the \sue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…Judge Robreno because regardless of what causation standard applies, it is a general principle of Alabama tort law that the plaintiff bears the burden of submitting evidence proving that the defendant caused his injuries. See Turner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…asbestos-containing packing and/or gaskets were offered until the mid-1980s." (Doc. 314-7, at 2.) \[7\] As a general proposition, when asked whether the actual pumps at Alabama River Pulp contained asbestos, Morgan responded…