41 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
…whether substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that a suitable forum exists. (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.) Here appellants claim the lower court erred in finding that…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Marteney v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)
…product, provided that their own parts or material were nondefective, and they did not exercise control over the end product. (Artiglio v. General Electric. Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 838-840.) In Walker, the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2021
Webb v. General Cable Corp. (2021)
…plaintiffs Amos and Jeannie Webb against General Cable and directed the trial court to enter judgment for General Cable, because the evidence did not show Webb was exposed to asbestos in General Cable's products. A…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 17, 2015
Casey v. Dynalectric Company (2015)
…The Court of Appeal reversed. It held that California's General Industry Safety Orders on harmful dust created a duty to use reasonable care against exposing others to significant industrial dust, whether or not asbestos was…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)
…witness declaration. We shall affirm the judgment. I. BACKGROUND Desin was an electrician. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos while working at various job sites and that as a result he developed mesothelioma, an asbestos…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…of Review We discussed the long-established law governing directed verdicts in North Counties Engineering, Inc. v. State Farm General Ins. Co. (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 902, 920 \[169 Cal.Rptr.3d 726\] (North Counties)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)
…that is the most deadly of the three. It also described the general agreement that the diseases are positively correlated to the intensity and duration of exposure to asbestos dust, but noted "there is no conclusive…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)
…pipe between 1971 and 1976. While working with asbestos cement pipe, Mr. Cookus used an electric saw to cut pipe in a trench. Dust would blow all over the place. Mr. Cookus worked with the Alex…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. Inc. (2016)
…the following information: a. Proffered Opinion Mr. van der Bogert was given a "pretty general, broad" task: "Read the testimony and form an opinion relative to the interactions or potential interactions between, in this case specifically…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…her work history sheets, from speaking to Joan and her attorney, and from his general knowledge of the work practices of using joint compound in installing drywall—which included sanding, which creates dust, and sweeping the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012
Casey v. Perini Corporation (2012)
The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for general contractor Perini Corporation against plaintiffs Patricia and John Casey, holding the trial court properly excluded plaintiffs' expert declaration and that plaintiffs offered only speculation about exposure. An…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 23, 2018
Rudolph v. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (2018)
…his wife Pamela sued Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. (R&S), a general contracting company started by Allen's father. They alleged Allen developed mesothelioma from asbestos. According to the complaint, he was exposed as a child…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 14, 2017
Duty v. Trz Realty, LLC (2017)
…saying asbestos causes colon cancer. After a hearing, the trial court found he was not qualified on general or specific causation, mainly because he was not an epidemiologist or colorectal specialist. Plaintiffs then conceded they lacked…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…the party asserting the exception to a hirer's general non-liability for a contractor's employees bears the burden of proving that the contractor neither knew nor could reasonably be expected to know of the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)
…There, a subcontractor's employee sued a general contractor for injuries caused by the collapse of the general contractor's scaffolding; Cal-OSHA provisions were introduced at trial to establish a duty of care and a…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…or owed only a limited duty, is to be made on a more general basis suitable to the formulation of a legal rule, in most cases preserving for the jury the fact-specific question of whether…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014
Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)
…visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California mid to late 1970's; owner of a home construction business who visited jobsites Home construction jobsites in southern California 1970s; general contractor Construction projects 1960s and 1970s
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion
DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)
…material fact, such as judicial admissions by respondent. In sum, because there was no factual basis for appellants' general assertion of causation, "\the conclusion is unavoidable that summary judgment was properly granted.'" (Saelzler, supra, 25 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Klinger v. Alderete (2013)
…p. 34.) Although the defendant in Campbell was a property owner, not a general contractor employer, at least some of the reasoning expressed in Campbell for finding no liability would potentially apply to the underlying lawsuit…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011 · in the opinion
Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)
…and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Appellants Billie Jean Adams and her three children (Adams) brought suit for general and special damages against respondent Ford Motor Company (Ford) following the death of their husband and father, Richard Adams…