16 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · February 25, 2019
Harris v. CBS Corporation (2019)
Michael Roy Harris and his wife Elsie sued CBS Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand (IR) and other companies in California state court in Alameda County. They brought personal injury and loss of consortium claims. Michael Harris has malignant mesothelioma,…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…which specifies when a supplier of goods is subject to liability for providing dangerous items lacking suitable warnings to users either "\directly or through a third person.'"\[2\] (Mack v. General Electric Co. (E.D.Pa…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · October 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…detailed in his report that General Specifications for Machinery "required manufacturers to provide installation, operation and maintenance instructions as well as \safety precautions' as an essential part of Instruction Books for machinery and electrical equipment." (Doc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 28, 2011
Webster v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp. (2011)
…defeat a nonsuit; without evidence of exposure there is no causation. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Premises Owner Liability; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Mobil Torrance refinery (General Petroleum); Mobil refinery, Torrance, Torrance; U.S. Navy…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion
Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)
…914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · May 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Spurlin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…be contrary to the command for uniformity between rules governing the same injury, whether under the Jones Act or under the general maritime law. See id. There being no evidence that punitive damages were traditionally awarded…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)
…unable to conclude that the jury's verdict was based on a finding of negligent failure to warn because the special verdict form is inconsistent.\[5\] [\715] The jury was given general negligence instructions BAJI Nos…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Robinson v. Ssw, Inc. (2012)
…to specific enumerated "chapters and sections ... to the exclusion of the law of the jurisdiction in which they are [\600] incorporated." These specific enumerated provisions include neither chapter 2 in general nor section 2010 in particular. (…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion
Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)
…sufficient contact with the state for the court to assume either general or limited jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting among other things that ACL had consented to jurisdiction by making a general appearance…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion
Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
…is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…to chrysotile." \[3\] Although Silvestro again worked in construction after his career as boiler repairman, the evidence showed that use of asbestos in construction materials (and in general) was being curtailed by the 1970's, and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion
Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
…state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…concerning the character or quality of the chattel in question," and "does not apply to statements of opinion," "loose general praise," "sales talk," or "puffing." These requirements and limitations suggest that the misrepresentation must be affirmative…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion
Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)
…The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 2, 2007 · in the opinion
Foster Wheeler LLC v. Superior Court OF San Francisco County (2007)
…tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delays. The court concluded that limiting instructions and instructions in general to the jury would allay the defense fears of prejudice. Code of Civil Procedure section 1048, subdivision (a) provides:…