No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

27 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …The specifications provide that the contractor is to comply with all safety regulations and eliminate hazards to its own and other workers and that all work is subject to general supervision and inspection by PG&E…

  2. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …by overhead electrical wires\]; see also Rest.2d Torts, § 343A \[possessor of land liable for obvious danger if "the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such. . . obviousness"\].) The question before us is how these general principles…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)

    …omitted.) Here, the jury's findings on negligent failure to warn therefore do not preclude a finding that the trial court erred in failing to instruct on strict liability. (See Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Superior…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …38 P.3d 1081). However, the observations in Grahn about general premises liability remain good law. In Grahn, as in the case before us, the premises owner challenged a generic jury instruction describing a landowner's…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391, 397 \[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 441 P.3d 881\].) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …4th 1193, 1203.) The general rule is that persons are "obligated to exercise due care in \[their\] own actions so as to not to create an unreasonable risk of injury to others." (Lugtu v. California Highway…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    …391, 397; accord, Sabetian, supra, 57 Cal.App.5th at p. 1070.) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 619; accord…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 28, 2011

    Webster v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp. (2011)

    …defeat a nonsuit; without evidence of exposure there is no causation. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Premises Owner Liability; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Mobil Torrance refinery (General Petroleum); Mobil refinery, Torrance, Torrance; U.S. Navy…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …asbestos products. Failure to Warn; The Bare-Metal Defense; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Mobil Torrance refinery (General Petroleum); Mobil Oil Torrance refinery, FCC unit, Torrance stillsman in the FCC unit…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 19, 1997

    Barr v. ACandS, Inc. (1997)

    …2, allows suit within one year after disability. Following Darden v. General Motors, the Court of Appeal held that filing the first suit started the one-year period for all potentially responsible defendants, named or not…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Beckering v. Shell Oil Co. (2014)

    …and fibers, the third factor addressing the "\closeness of the connection' "between Ford's conduct (hiring a general contractor) and the injury to a worker's family member off the premises was "attenuated." (Id. at p…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2021 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. (2021)

    …court issue a remittitur for the dollar equivalent of twice the statutory compensation amount (that is, full statutory compensation for Sabetian's loss of his right testicle, and full compensation for impairment of his general health).

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …App.4th 246, 251-254 \[affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor on ground plaintiff lacked evidence he was present when the general contractor's employees performed insulation work likely to release asbestos dust\]; Casey…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …user defense, the ordinary users would have been Davis's employers, not Davis. As support, appellants cite Maneely v. General Motors Corp. (9th Cir. 1997) 108 F.3d 1176. In Maneely, applying California law, the court…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)

    …fibers. Honer then breathed these asbestos fibers because of her direct and indirect contact with her father and brother themselves as well as their clothes, vehicles, tools and general surroundings. In July 2004, Honer alleged, she…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)

    …s defense depended on evidence of Johns-Manville's sophistication. "Although the record clearly show\[ed\] Johns-Manville was aware of the risks of asbestos in general, no evidence established it knew about the particularly acute…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…