No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)

    …supra, 43 Cal.4th 56, a manufacturer is exempt from its general duty to warn users of its product's dangerous propensities if the plaintiff, by virtue of his or her specialized training or profession, knows…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION As an initial matter, the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …concerning the character or quality of the chattel in question," and "does not apply to statements of opinion," "loose general praise," "sales talk," or "puffing." These requirements and limitations suggest that the misrepresentation must be affirmative…