No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Lyons v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2017)

    …1078 \[109 Cal.Rptr.3d 371\], the plaintiffs alleged that the decedent had been exposed to asbestos by Bechtel Construction at two Pacific Gas and Electric sites constructed by Bechtel, "Contra Costa Buildings 6 and 7…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …upon, we think J&J has implicitly confirmed the reliability of Dr. Fitzgerald's sources by endorsing Dr. Sanchez's reliance on sources of the same general type. J&J attempts to argue that, without Dr…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …refusal to give general negligence instructions and the misstatements in reading the instructions caused no prejudicial error. A party is entitled to instructions on every theory supported by substantial evidence, but not to general negligence instructions…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)

    …Fitzgerald's opinion was based on the excluded testing, and therefore was also inadmissible. However, the court found Fitzgerald could give the general opinion that the product was "friable. . . that when dispersed it can be inhaled…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion

    Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.' \[Citation.\] The goal of trial court gatekeeping is simply to exclude \clearly invalid and…