19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 17, 2007
Machnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2007)
The court denied Machnik's motion to remand to state court, finding that General Electric had justified federal officer removal, so the case stayed in federal court. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 7, 2020
Carlson v. CBS Corporation (2020)
The court granted General Electric's unopposed motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Carlsons' claims against it with prejudice, along with Ms. Carlson's consortium claim and the cross-claims of Foster Wheeler and Crane Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 28, 2009
Kotecki v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2009)
…motion to remand, keeping the case in federal court because Buffalo Pumps and General Electric showed a colorable federal officer (military contractor) defense. A defendant may remove under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · November 13, 2007
Contois v. Able Industries Inc. (2007)
The court denied the executrix's motion to remand, holding that Buffalo Pumps' removal was timely and that Buffalo Pumps and General Electric satisfied federal officer removal requirements, so the case stays in federal court. A…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · October 27, 2008
Carroll v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…Carrolls' motion to remand, holding that defendants Viad, General Electric and Buffalo Pumps properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer statute, 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Clark v. Aii Acquisition, LLC (2018)
…Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees, The Boeing Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec LLC, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company, Goodyear Canada, INC., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Harco LLC, fka Harco Laboratories, Inc., Henkel Corporation…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Brochu v. Aesys Technologies (2015)
…D & N Insulation Co.; Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc.; Fairbanks Morse Engines; Foster Wheeler Corp.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Homasote Co.; IMO Industries, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)
…24 (Crane); 84:6-24 (same). He was able to recall only the brands Westinghouse and General Electric without prompting. Choate was prompted to describe certain elements of the products he recalled, such as their label…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 19, 1996
Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1996)
…and remanded with direction to deny her claim, so General Dynamics/Electric Boat and its insurers won. Under the statutes then in force, dependent's death benefits for an occupational disease are based on average weekly…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997
Estate OF Frederick v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)
…decedent's estate and dependent widow, ruling against Electric Boat/General Dynamics and its insurer. A surviving dependent spouse and the estate of an employee who died of an occupational disease are entitled to benefits under §…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997 · in the opinion
Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)
245 Conn. 66 (1998) CELESTINA GREEN v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION, ET AL. (SC 15649) Argued October 30, 1997. Officially released June 9, 1998. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Callahan, C. J., and Borden, Berdon…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Dusto v. Rogers Corporation (2023)
…179-80. In Connecticut, the legislature enacted workers' compensation legislation that included a broad exclusivity provision with no express exceptions for intentional torts of the employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a). The legislature also elected…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Estate OF Rock v. University of Connecticut (2016)
…is whether the plaintiff, Estate of James Rock, has standing under the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., to seek benefits for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability, as well as…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 18, 2016
Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2016)
…of the estate's asbestos claims against Lockheed Martin for lack of personal jurisdiction in Connecticut. A corporation is not subject to general jurisdiction merely because it has substantial but small-share contacts with a state…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 18, 2008 · in the opinion
Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co. (2008)
…and which were purportedly critical to the removal determination), Buffalo Pumps instead proffered its factual basis for removal in broad, general terms. According to the notice, Buffalo Pumps had satisfied the statutory requirements for removal during…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · April 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Group (2017)
\[12\] "Common knowledge is limited, however, to those well substantiated facts that are obvious to the general community." State v. Padua, 273 Conn. 138, 193, 869 A.2d 192 (2005) (Katz, J., dissenting and concurring). Common…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion
Martin Franchises, Inc. v. Cooper US, Inc. (2016)
…Furthermore, the defendant pleaded two special defenses, the first of which was that the plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 52-576, and the second of which…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · June 7, 1984 · in the opinion
Bauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)
…the plaintiff has cited a number of cases stating the general rule regarding retroactive application of statutes of limitation: statutes of limitation are ordinarily considered procedural and are retroactively applied to actions pending on or brought…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 15, 2024 · in the opinion
In re Nash Engineering Company (2024)
…incurring of debt, onset of financial difficulties, or pendency or threat of suits by creditors; and (6) the general chronology of the events and transactions under inquiry. In re Anderson, 623 B.R. 199, 213-14…