32 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 15, 2009
Murphy v. General Electric Company (2009)
…court denied the plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court, holding that General Electric and Buffalo Pumps could remove the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant can remove under 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 17, 2007
Machnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2007)
The court denied Machnik's motion to remand to state court, finding that General Electric had justified federal officer removal, so the case stayed in federal court. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 7, 2020
Carlson v. CBS Corporation (2020)
The court granted General Electric's unopposed motion for summary judgment, dismissing the Carlsons' claims against it with prejudice, along with Ms. Carlson's consortium claim and the cross-claims of Foster Wheeler and Crane Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 28, 2009
Kotecki v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2009)
…motion to remand, keeping the case in federal court because Buffalo Pumps and General Electric showed a colorable federal officer (military contractor) defense. A defendant may remove under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · November 13, 2007
Contois v. Able Industries Inc. (2007)
The court denied the executrix's motion to remand, holding that Buffalo Pumps' removal was timely and that Buffalo Pumps and General Electric satisfied federal officer removal requirements, so the case stays in federal court. A…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · October 27, 2008
Carroll v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)
…Carrolls' motion to remand, holding that defendants Viad, General Electric and Buffalo Pumps properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer statute, 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Clark v. Aii Acquisition, LLC (2018)
…Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees, The Boeing Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec LLC, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company, Goodyear Canada, INC., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Harco LLC, fka Harco Laboratories, Inc., Henkel Corporation…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · December 18, 2019 · in the opinion
Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. (2019)
…medical monitoring test outlined in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation, 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied sub nom. General Electric Co. v. Knight, 499 U.S. 961, 111 S. Ct…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · September 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (2020)
…him a monitoring regime different \[from\] the one that would have been prescribed in the absence of that particular exposure" (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied sub nom. General Electric Co. v. Ingram, 513 U.S…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Brochu v. Aesys Technologies (2015)
…D & N Insulation Co.; Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc.; Fairbanks Morse Engines; Foster Wheeler Corp.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Homasote Co.; IMO Industries, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)
…24 (Crane); 84:6-24 (same). He was able to recall only the brands Westinghouse and General Electric without prompting. Choate was prompted to describe certain elements of the products he recalled, such as their label…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · January 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Erhardt v. Bmw OF North America, LLC (2021)
…Answer, ECF No. 68 (Aug. 21, 2018). On August 22, 2018, General Electric Co. filed an Answer with affirmative defenses and cross-claims against all Defendants. Answer, ECF No. 70 (Aug. 22, 2018). On August 30…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 19, 1996
Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1996)
…and remanded with direction to deny her claim, so General Dynamics/Electric Boat and its insurers won. Under the statutes then in force, dependent's death benefits for an occupational disease are based on average weekly…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · January 11, 2001
Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp. (2001)
…burden, and the judge did not apply the abolished 'true doubt' rule. Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat shipyard, Groton, Groton test man and technical aide Electric Boat shipyard, Groton…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997
Estate OF Frederick v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)
…decedent's estate and dependent widow, ruling against Electric Boat/General Dynamics and its insurer. A surviving dependent spouse and the estate of an employee who died of an occupational disease are entitled to benefits under §…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · October 30, 1997 · in the opinion
Green v. General Dynamics Corp. (1997)
245 Conn. 66 (1998) CELESTINA GREEN v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION, ET AL. (SC 15649) Argued October 30, 1997. Officially released June 9, 1998. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Callahan, C. J., and Borden, Berdon…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2023 · in the opinion
Dusto v. Rogers Corporation (2023)
…179-80. In Connecticut, the legislature enacted workers' compensation legislation that included a broad exclusivity provision with no express exceptions for intentional torts of the employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a). The legislature also elected…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
…in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…