23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009
Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)
…district court denied the plaintiffs' motions to remand both cases to Delaware state court, holding that General Electric had established federal officer removal jurisdiction. A contractor may remove under the federal officer removal statute, construed broadly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · May 15, 2019
Rogers v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Warren Pumps, General Electric, Air & Liquid Systems, Charles A. Wagner Co., and Asbestos Corporation Ltd. against plaintiff Richard Rogers, because he could not show exposure to any defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · May 13, 2019
Rogers v. Nosroc Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Steinaker, Norfolk; DuPont Seaford plant, Seaford machinist mate USS Moale Newport 1966-1967; machinist mate performing pump maintenance USS Steinaker Norfolk 1967-1970; housekeeping DuPont Seaford plant Seaford 1966, 1970-1973; general construction, builder 1973 onward
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Nash Engineering Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Eric Scott Thompson, Franklin & Prokopik. Velan Valve Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Donald Robert Kinsley, Maron…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)
…Shawn Edward Martyniak, Swartz Campbell LLC. Eaton Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gould Electronics Inc., Cross Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)
…products. \[8\] Compare, e.g., the affidavits submitted by General Electric Company in Kirks v. General Electric Company, Civ. No. 08-856-SLR, (D. Del. Sept. 17, 2009) and Wiersma v. General Electric Company, Civ. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Pieno v. Crosby Valve (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…a claim under Florida law, a plaintiff must simply show that a defendant's product was a "substantial contributing factor" to the injury that occurred.\[11\] Faddish v. General Electric Co., 2010 WL 4146108, at [\3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 13, 2021
Gilstrap v. CBS Corporation (2021)
…Robert E. Lee 1959-1964; trainee/trainer Nuclear Power School Idaho Falls 1964-1967; master chief, engine room supervisor / Chief of the Boat General Dynamics/Electric Boat shipyard (USS Omaha and USS Indianapolis) Groton 1975-1980
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Denbow v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…of 1963. (Id.) D. Plaintiff's product identification evidence Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Charlevoix stated that he performed maintenance work on eight Caterpillar bulldozers during his time at M.J. Electric. (D.I. 155, Ex. 1 at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 7, 2025 · in the opinion
Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2025)
…Wrongful Death, and Loss of Consortium claims under General Maritime Law The Vessel Defendants argue that no federal court recognize a cause of action for "take-home" asbestos exposure under the Jones Act or maritime law. …
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…for hazards faced by an independent contractor's employee unless it actively controlled the manner and method of the work, and general superintendence is not enough. DP&L did not actively control the work at Edgemoor…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 29, 2017
Walsh v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…was a substantial factor in causing the injury. The court found the Walshes' evidence did not support that inference and that they were stretching general testimony about replacement parts. Because they bore the burden of proof…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)
Jun. 9, 2011) (TRANSCRIPT). \[27\] See, e.g., Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002). \[28\] In re: Asbestos Litig. (Bowser), C.A. No. N10C-05-104 ASB (Jun. 3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Vocciante v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Id. at ¶ 28) Accordingly, plaintiffs assert claims for strict liability, negligence, false representation, violation of the Jones Act, violation of general maritime law, loss of consortium, wrongful death, and seek, inter alia, punitive damages. (Id. at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Pruitt v. Gardner Denver (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…The Court has reviewed the affidavit of Captain Moore and his opinion that: The 1972 general information book records one Gardner Denver horizontal centrifugal emergency fire pump driven by a diesel engine was installed in the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Roadarmel v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2023)
…at 322. The Defendant does not identify which counts of the complaint should arguably be dismissed and refers only to general descriptions of them as "ancillary" or "incidental." (D.I. 26 at 14) In arguing for…