No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020

    Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)

    … Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 13, 2019

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …law, a plaintiff must show exposure to each defendant's product and that the product was a substantial factor in causing the injury. A general recollection of a manufacturer's name, with no detail on where…

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Air Prods. and Chemicals (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …facts for a jury to infer that asbestos was inherent in Defendant's premises. Even assuming that under a premise owner's general duty, which the Smith court expanded to include that a land owner "had…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …the Supreme Court explained: It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit…

  7. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …a United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that the Smtih court expanded the general land owner duty to include that a land owner "had a duty to take reasonable steps to…

  8. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    McLaughlin v. C&d Contractors (2022)

    …interpret the Act liberally to effectuate its remedial objective.\[35\] This liberal interpretation recognizes that the General Assembly passed the Act for the express purpose of benefitting the worker and requires the Court to resolve any…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Holdings, 198 P.3d 493 (Wash. 2008) recognized the general rule that "a manufacturer does not have an obligation to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's product." Braaten, 198 P.3d at 501. Therefore…