No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …U.S. at 534, 115 S.Ct. 1043; Reynolds v. General Electric Co., 2012 WL 2835500 (E.D.Pa.2012). On the other hand, if the worker's exposure was primarily land based, then, even if…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · March 13, 2008

    Marley v. Elliot Turbomachinery Co., Inc. (2008)

    …defense and show a causal nexus to its official duties, without proving the defense on the merits. General affidavits from Navy admirals suffice at the removal stage. Failure to Warn; Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …Court must consider whether Oneal's claims are governed by federal admiralty law or by state law. In general, admiralty law applies to a tort action when the alleged tort occurred on navigable waters and the…

  4. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 5, 1985 · in the opinion

    Meehan v. Celotex Corp. (1985)

    …of the negligent act. Indeed, as Gaboury itself says: "In determining the proper forum in which to bring suit under the general statute fixing venue where the cause of action \arose', or \accrued', the \injury occurred…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 3, 2024 · in the opinion

    Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …Zhang's two key challenged statements. The Court agrees with Defendants on one general point. The "cumulative exposure theory," to the extent it holds that even a de minimis exposure to asbestos can be a substantial…

  6. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Davies v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1994)

    …knowledge with him as a member of the board of directors of OI. The adverse exception of the general rule is not applicable in this case. Ames was not acting solely for his own personal benefit…