No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 30, 2011

    Sublett v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2011)

    …finding General Electric had not established federal officer removal jurisdiction. A removing defendant must show the Navy prevented it from complying with state-law warning duties to establish federal officer jurisdiction and the government contractor defense…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)

    …Corporation, Chicago Bridge and Iron, Commonwealth Edison, Foseco, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, General Electric, Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Lincoln Electric Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pittsburgh Metals Purifying, a/k/a Treesdale, Inc., Reynolds Aluminum…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …Pump Division and Successor in Interest to Edward Valves; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to C.H. Wheeler; General Electric Company; John Crane, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Trane U.S.…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 6, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …INC.; SPIRAX SARCO, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation; FLOWSERVE US, INC. a…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …participate in the conspiracy. Id. If, after resigning from General Electric, Naples had come clean and reported the conspiracy to authorities, the conspiracy — which he had helped to arrange — would have been thwarted. In the government…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · May 19, 2014

    Horrie v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …as contracts or Navy warning requirements, that the government controlled the warnings and that this conflicted with state law. Crane's general affidavits did not do so. Failure to Warn; Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024

    Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)

    …may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…

  8. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)

    …determining whether a plaintiff has satisfied the burden of proof at trial. We began by reciting the "general rule in civil cases" that a plaintiff bears the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …Salisbury, 2014 WL 345214, at [\8]. This court will follow that middle path. In general, consistent with the bare metal defense, a manufacturer is not liable for materials it did not supply. But a duty may…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion

    McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Linder v. AW Chesterton Co. (2020)

    …of personal jurisdiction, arguing that it is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business in Georgia and had no contacts with Illinois to subject it to the circuit court's general jurisdiction. As to…