No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gregory v. Beazer East (2008)

    …Corporation, Chicago Bridge and Iron, Commonwealth Edison, Foseco, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, General Electric, Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Lincoln Electric Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pittsburgh Metals Purifying, a/k/a Treesdale, Inc., Reynolds Aluminum…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …Pump Division and Successor in Interest to Edward Valves; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to C.H. Wheeler; General Electric Company; John Crane, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Trane U.S.…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …participate in the conspiracy. Id. If, after resigning from General Electric, Naples had come clean and reported the conspiracy to authorities, the conspiracy — which he had helped to arrange — would have been thwarted. In the government…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024

    Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)

    …may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…

  5. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)

    …determining whether a plaintiff has satisfied the burden of proof at trial. We began by reciting the "general rule in civil cases" that a plaintiff bears the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …on claimant's testimony regarding his work on the boilers and the appearance of the gaskets. The Commission also relied on the testimony of Norris, H & H's general foreman, that the gaskets contained asbestos. Moreover…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…