No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · July 8, 1988 · in the opinion

    Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1988)

    …any site or area where a hazardous substance has been deposited, stored, disposed of, or otherwise come to be located." State v. General Electric Co., 592 F.Supp. 291, 295 (N.D. NY 1984) (citation omitted)…

  3. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Myers v. Bremen Casting, Inc. (2016)

    …asbestos work on the Defendants' premises created a peculiar risk of harm as applied to Larry, an electrician. The due precaution exception to the general rule of non-liability is available to the Myerses. In sum…

  4. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · June 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2005)

    In contrast, the previously defined exceptions to the general rule of nonliability for negligence of an independent contractor had found the principal liable not for its own negligence, but for negligence of its contractor in carrying…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    …822 (1971); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th…

  6. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion

    Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)

    …concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…

  7. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004

    Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)

    …and the landowner should have anticipated the harm, including where it saw workers going unprotected. A general verdict stands if the evidence supports any one theory of liability. Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits…

  8. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  9. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 6, 2004 · in the opinion

    Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2004)

    …out of and in the course of the employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable, except where such diseases follow as an incident…

  10. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion

    Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…

  11. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 8, 2007 · in the opinion

    Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2007)

    …statute. Id. A. Article I, Section 23, the Privileges and Immunities Clause The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides: "The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon…