No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Durham v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    …Therefore, if premises owners are "deemed to be \contractors,' the owners, like any other employers, are immune from tort liability with respect to work-related injuries\[.\]" General Electric Co. v. Cain, 236 S.W.3d 579…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)

    …526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…

  4. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …Daubert rubric." Id. Dr. Morgan reviewed two articles detailing studies which had concluded that elevator mechanics carry a greater risk of developing asbestos-related diseases than the general population. He further recounted that it was established…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)

    …however, must be reasonable, that is they must "indicate the probable, as distinguished from a possible cause." Briner v. General Motors Corporation, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 99, 101 (1970). Id. at 872-73. More recently…