No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005

    Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)

    James Rehm, a millwright employed by Rapid Installation from about 1975 to 1982, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2001 and died in 2002. He, and later his wife as executrix and his children, sued sixteen companies that owned the facilities where…

  3. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Company v. Sheets (2019)

    …Ford argued that it was immune from tort liability as an "up-the-ladder" or statutory employer under KRS\[1\] 342.610(2)(b) of the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Act (Act), citing General Electric v. Cain…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)

    …Ctr., Inc., Ky., 807 S.W.2d 476 (1991)." Gafford v. General Electric Co., 997 F.2d 150, 165 (6th Cir. 1993). DISCUSSION As mentioned supra, the Defendant asserts that the 1986 release signed by Mr…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rehm v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …Daubert rubric." Id. Dr. Morgan reviewed two articles detailing studies which had concluded that elevator mechanics carry a greater risk of developing asbestos-related diseases than the general population. He further recounted that it was established…

  6. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · May 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Sunbeam Corporation v. Dortch (2010)

    …B.R. 268 (Bankr. D. N.J. 1984) address claims that fall within exceptions to the general rule of concurrent state court jurisdiction. Those exceptions do not apply here. In the third, In re Comer, 723…