10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 30, 1983 · in the opinion
Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1983)
…appears that the tests are the same, since, in general "\[o\]nce admiralty jurisdiction is established, then all of the substantive rules and precepts peculiar to the law of the sea become applicable." Brance v. Shumann…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · June 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…(ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, this motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Victor Coffin served as an aviation electrician in the U.S. Navy from January 1968 to September 1971, as a machinist…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)
…86-89). For the reasons set forth below, I DENY these motions. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Victor Coffin served as an aviation electrician in the U.S. Navy from January 1968 to September 1971, as a machinist for…
-
Exposure sites · Maine
Maine Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage
…General Dynamics since 1995 and still builds destroyers for the Navy. The company's Hardings plant in Brunswick is listed separately. Workers exposed. Shipbuilding operations at Bath required boilermakers, pipefitters, insulators, sheet-metal workers, machinists, electricians…
-
State law · Maine
Maine Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation
…Raymark Indus., Inc., 516 A.2d 534 (Me. 1986) (Bath Iron Works boilermaker and electrician): "inhalation alone is insufficient"; "The actionable harm is the manifestation of disease in the body, not the exposure"; a claim under…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · October 15, 1986 · in the opinion
Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…is an important limitation of the seller's liability. In general, "\[t\]he rule of strict liability subjects the seller to liability to [\540] the user or consumer even though he has exercised all possible care…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · January 25, 2021
Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2021)
…turns on actual or constructive notice and is ordinarily a jury question; a railroad's general knowledge of asbestos hazards and disputed evidence of escaping dust prevent summary judgment on foreseeability. Causation; Employer and Contractor Liability…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · December 29, 1986 · in the opinion
In re All Maine Asbestos Litigation (1986)
…very different tone than the 1969 Ship Repair Contracting Manual's Paragraph 12-7(b), which states that "\[i\]n general, the SUPSHIP surveyor should not be concerned with unsafe practices on the part of the…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…at 799; Prosser, supra at 522. Recent cases typified by Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 575 P.2d 1162, 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 (1978) (ordinary contributory negligence of plaintiff to be considered…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · February 24, 1981 · in the opinion
Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)
…Counts V and VI seek contribution or indemnification by BIW for any damages plaintiff may recover against Armstrong Cork. II BIW's motion for summary judgment presents three general issues: (1) Do the allegations of wilful…