No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 3, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rhodes v. Mcic, Inc. (2017)

    General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC & Donald S. Meringer, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC. General Refractories, Co., Cross Defendant, represented by John Stewart Cobb, North and Cobb…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Inc., Defendants, represented by Geoffrey S. Gavett, Gavett Datt and Barish PC & Laura D. Abenes, Gavett, Datt Barish PC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Donald S. Meringer, Miles & Stockbridge P.C. & Michael L. Haslup, Miles…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2018)

    …by Cheri V. Koerner, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Stephen Anthony Fennell, Steptoe and Johnson LLP & Jamie Michelle Hertz, Steptoe & Johnson LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Donald S. Meringer, Meringer Zois and Quigg LLC. Ferro Engineering…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    …the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)

    …R's warning and "taken steps to have the clothes washed at a commercial laundry services." This argument fails both as a general matter and under the facts specific to this case. First, the general matter…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)

    …Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2008) (language in general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), "is deliberately parallel to the requirements for notice pleading found in Rule 8…