Search

• State: Maryland ×
• Topic: lung cancer ×
• Clear filters

6 results for “General Electric”

1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

   Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

   …money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…

2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

   ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

   …Travelers"), PH's insurer, in which Travelers stated: The Travelers Insurance Company has been underwriting your Workmen's Compensation and General Liability since January 1953 and unfortunately, there have been some serious losses during this period…

3. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 5, 2016 · in the opinion

   RJ Reynolds Tobacco v. Stidham (2016)

   …shortly but will add first our concern as to whether, if that policy is a general one that the court intends [\13] to apply in every synergy case, without regard to particular circumstances of the case…

4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

   Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

   …For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the general rule imposing the burden on the plaintiff should be applied in this case against appellees. A. THE BURDEN TO ESTABLISH THAT THE STATUTORY CAP DOES NOT…

5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 30, 1999 · in the opinion

   Porter Hayden Company v. Wyche (1999)

   …to the earliest diagnosis, from adenocarcinoma is 13.2 years." Although Porter Hayden seems to take issue in its reply brief with the use of general epidemiological testimony to draw inferences in specific cases, in Grimshaw…

6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 2, 2013 · in the opinion

   Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Carter (2013)

   …the non manufacturer supplier to warn plaintiffs is different under some circumstances than the duty of a manufacturer. In general, the supplier-installer is not held to a standard as strict as imposed on the manufacturer.