11 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · January 27, 2025 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AH Bennett Company (2025)
…Plc, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Dezurik, Inc., Flowserve US, Inc., FMC Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Gagon, Inc., General Electric Company, Goulds Pumps, LLC, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Guard-Line, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT, LLC, Paramount Global…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 21, 2007
Strand v. Allied Insulation Supply Co. (2007)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of General Pipe Covering's third-party contribution claims against Quality Insulation and Econ Insulation, so Quality and Econ won and General Pipe lost. When settling parties invoke Pierringer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · October 10, 2017
McGill v. Conwed Corporation (2017)
…A foreign corporation whose Minnesota authority to do business was revoked is not deemed to consent to jurisdiction by having a registered agent, and the court lacked general or specific jurisdiction over it. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion
Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)
…1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Backe v. AW Kuettel & Sons, Inc. (2020)
…LLC, 884 N.W.2d 321, 328 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted). Caselaw recognizes two distinct types of personal jurisdiction: "general" jurisdiction and "specific" jurisdiction. Valspar, 495 N.W.2d at 411. "Personal jurisdiction refers to a…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Rock v. Bucyrus Int'l (In re Minnesota Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…the district court issued a case-management order, setting forth general discovery provisions for "all presently pending and future Minnesota Personal Injury Asbestos cases." In January 1999, the district court amended the 1994 case-management order…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 13, 1989 · in the opinion
Kath v. Burlington Northern R. Co. (1989)
…rejected this requested interrogatory, Burlington claims reversible error. The general rule is that parties are entitled to have all issues of fact submitted to the jury except those which are waived. Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · April 6, 1999 · in the opinion
Tester v. American Standard, Inc. (1999)
…604.02, subd. 3 (1998), provides an exception to this general rule and allows an at-fault plaintiff to recover from a less-at-fault defendant in products liability cases. Section 604.02, subdivision 3, provides…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 8, 2006 · in the opinion
Duffy v. American Standard, Inc. (2006)
…who is now deceased, made several general statements indicating that Hormel and Scheid employees "worked together," no testimony was elicited to indicate any specific tasks that the two sets of employees performed together. Duffy testified that…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Conda v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…causation experts were foundationally reliable and properly admitted" and that "those opinions established a prima facie case of general and specific causation using the legal standard established by the court when trial commenced." The district court…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 29, 2008 · in the opinion
James v. 3M Corporation (2008)
…play and substantial justice." Juelich, 682 N.W.2d at 570. The degree of the defendant's contacts with the forum state determines whether the defendant may be subject to general or specific personal jurisdiction. Marshall…