19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · January 27, 2025 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AH Bennett Company (2025)
…Plc, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Dezurik, Inc., Flowserve US, Inc., FMC Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Gagon, Inc., General Electric Company, Goulds Pumps, LLC, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Guard-Line, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT, LLC, Paramount Global…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · April 20, 1974 · in the opinion
United States v. Reserve Mining Company (1974)
…with applicable regulations, the effect on the work force would be minimal. The defendants' work force includes machinists, welders, electricians, engineers, and laborers whose services could be utilized in additional pipe and plant construction. The plight…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · November 7, 1990 · in the opinion
Independent School Dist. No. 197 v. WR Grace (1990)
…announced the subject more clearly in its title, the 1987 enactment of the revival statute, did fall within the embrace of "some one general subject," i.e., insurance. While the revival statute does not specifically refer…
-
Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · October 4, 2001 · in the opinion
Conwed v. Union Carbide Chem. and Plastics (2001)
…thereby giving Conwed the present right to bring a subrogation suit against Union Carbide. We disagree. As a general rule, an employee's cause of action for workers' compensation benefits stemming from an occupational disease does…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 21, 2007
Strand v. Allied Insulation Supply Co. (2007)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of General Pipe Covering's third-party contribution claims against Quality Insulation and Econ Insulation, so Quality and Econ won and General Pipe lost. When settling parties invoke Pierringer…
-
Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · May 14, 1982 · in the opinion
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. (1982)
…the court concluded that because the tolling provisions of the general limitations statute were in existence prior to the enactment of the wrongful death statute the legislature "could not possibly have had in mind that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · October 10, 2017
McGill v. Conwed Corporation (2017)
…A foreign corporation whose Minnesota authority to do business was revoked is not deemed to consent to jurisdiction by having a registered agent, and the court lacked general or specific jurisdiction over it. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · January 11, 1982 · in the opinion
Bertrand v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)
…discretion to determine when it should be applied. The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion
Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)
…1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Api, Inc. (2005)
…without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…
-
Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · June 26, 1992 · in the opinion
80 S. 8th St. Ltd. Ptsp. v. Carey-Canada (1992)
…tenants who lease space in the building, by maintenance and administrative staff, and by the general public. [\395] The original owners of the IDS Center sold the property to Oxford Development Minnesota, Inc. ("Oxford") in 1981…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Backe v. AW Kuettel & Sons, Inc. (2020)
…LLC, 884 N.W.2d 321, 328 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted). Caselaw recognizes two distinct types of personal jurisdiction: "general" jurisdiction and "specific" jurisdiction. Valspar, 495 N.W.2d at 411. "Personal jurisdiction refers to a…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Rock v. Bucyrus Int'l (In re Minnesota Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…the district court issued a case-management order, setting forth general discovery provisions for "all presently pending and future Minnesota Personal Injury Asbestos cases." In January 1999, the district court amended the 1994 case-management order…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 13, 1989 · in the opinion
Kath v. Burlington Northern R. Co. (1989)
…rejected this requested interrogatory, Burlington claims reversible error. The general rule is that parties are entitled to have all issues of fact submitted to the jury except those which are waived. Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · April 6, 1999 · in the opinion
Tester v. American Standard, Inc. (1999)
…604.02, subd. 3 (1998), provides an exception to this general rule and allows an at-fault plaintiff to recover from a less-at-fault defendant in products liability cases. Section 604.02, subdivision 3, provides…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Filipek v. the Boeing Company (2017)
…NO. 23: Admit that Plaintiff Marlin Filipek was diagnosed with an asbestos- related disease prior to May 19, 2010. ANSWER: Plaintiffs incorporate by reference General Objections 1-8. Subject to and without waiving these objections, admit…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · August 8, 2006 · in the opinion
Duffy v. American Standard, Inc. (2006)
…who is now deceased, made several general statements indicating that Hormel and Scheid employees "worked together," no testimony was elicited to indicate any specific tasks that the two sets of employees performed together. Duffy testified that…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Conda v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…causation experts were foundationally reliable and properly admitted" and that "those opinions established a prima facie case of general and specific causation using the legal standard established by the court when trial commenced." The district court…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · July 29, 2008 · in the opinion
James v. 3M Corporation (2008)
…play and substantial justice." Juelich, 682 N.W.2d at 570. The degree of the defendant's contacts with the forum state determines whether the defendant may be subject to general or specific personal jurisdiction. Marshall…