No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 22, 2021

    Lindsey v. Dow Chemical Company (2021)

    Kris Lindsey, a Florida citizen diagnosed with mesothelioma in September 2020, sued twelve companies in a St. Louis state court. His amended petition alleged he was exposed to asbestos from Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, used on him as an infant and…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019

    Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …only Missouri defendant. Johnson & Johnson then asked the court to dismiss the case for improper venue or transfer it to the Eastern District of Tennessee, relying on the general venue statute and § 1406. The court denied…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · February 14, 2019

    Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …sister company is generally not liable for another company's acts absent a pleaded alter ego or agency theory, and general allegations of commonality do not plead alter ego under Delaware law. Product Identification; Successor Liability…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · August 12, 2024 · in the opinion

    Guthe v. Johnson & Johnson (2024)

    …App. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The general rule is that after delivering the contract work to a purchaser, a contractor is not liable to persons with whom it did not contract, unless the…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (2020)

    …of a motion to transfer under § 1404(a), the general view is \that courts can just as easily apply the law of another state as easily as their own.'" See generally Oien v. Thompson, 824 F…

  6. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion

    Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)

    …forth sufficient minimum contacts between Defendants and Missouri to allow the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over them on the Non-Resident Plaintiffs' claims. "Courts recognize two categories of personal jurisdiction: general and specific." Ristesund v…

  7. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion

    Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)

    …provided for the assumption of liabilities actual and contingent and the peripheral issue of choice of laws. The elements of a de facto merger are: (1) a continuation of management and personnel and general business operations…