No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l (2016)

    …Inc.; Fortune Brands Home & Security Inc., individually, d/b/a and as successor to Moen Inc.; Foster Wheeler LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific LLC; the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Inc.; Graco Inc.; Grundfos…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2018)

    …interest to Victor and Spicer; ECR INTERNATIONAL, INC., as successor-in-interest to Dunkirk Radiator Corporation; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GENERAL PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., as successor-in-interest to Ridgewood Corp.; HB SMITH CO., INC.; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Becker v. Baron Bros. (1994)

    …Moreover, after studying the air in the service stations of several General Motors dealerships, he determined that the level of fibers in the air was under the threshold limit value for chrysotile established by the Conference…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion

    Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)

    …CO., C.L. ZIMMERMAN of DELAWARE, a successor corporation to C.L. ZIMMERMAN COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 24, 2022

    Marino v. Abex Corporation (2022)

    …harmless. A trial court may sanction a party for violating a discovery consent order by directing a verdict on duty and breach, and on general causation, where the violation was deliberate and the sanction fit it…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 26, 2021

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2021)

    …be told this. In multi-defendant asbestos cases, medical causation instructions must include the frequency, regularity and proximity test, not just a general proximate cause charge. Causation; Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; Sophisticated User…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · June 30, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fowler v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. (2022)

    …provides: There is no general rule as to whether one supplying a product for the use of others through an intermediary has a duty to warn the ultimate product user directly or may rely on the…