6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion
Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)
…FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, individually and as successor to The Duriron Company, Inc., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, FROMM ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, GENERAL SUPPLY COMPANY, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, GREENE…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 19, 2016 · in the opinion
Vesper v. 3M Company (2016)
…MATTHEW P. KESSLER, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER PC. FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1994 · in the opinion
Goss v. American Cyanamid Co. (1994)
…as a salesperson to the American Cyanamid plant that there should be an inference raised that he sold them asbestos containing products inasmuch as they were available to customers of Madsen & Howell in a general sense…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989 · in the opinion
Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)
…in the evaluation of the damage claim against the defendant. In this way, to the extent that men can achieve justice through general rules, a just balance of the warring interests is accomplished. \[Citations omitted\]. Cf…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 22, 1988 · in the opinion
Millison v. EI du Pont de Nemours (1988)
…Ed. 610, 617 (1939); U.S. v. Trotter, 529, F.2d 806 (3d Cir.1976); State v. General Restoration Co., 42 N.J. 366, 375 (1964); State v. Sherwin, 127 N.J. Super. 370 (App.Div…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion
Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)
…decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…