8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 7, 2015
Haas v. 3M Company (2015)
The Third Circuit vacated the District Court's summary judgment for General Electric, which Haas had appealed, and remanded for further proceedings. It also held the District Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Brasmer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · September 25, 2019
McClung v. 3M Company (2019)
The district court denied Plaintiff's objections, adopted the magistrate judge's recommendations as modified, found no personal jurisdiction over General Electric or Boeing, denied their motions to dismiss, and severed and transferred the claims against…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017
McClung v. 3M Company (2017)
The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014
Haas v. 3M Company (2014)
…continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)
…alleged that "\[f\]rom approximately 1983 to 2004, Mr. Scearce was exposed to asbestos-containing products while conducting electric repair work at various Air Force base sites, including McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey. Mr…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 28, 2021
Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)
The court granted Boeing's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding no general or specific jurisdiction over Boeing in New Jersey, denied jurisdictional discovery, and declined to transfer the claims, so Boeing won…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 15, 2021 · in the opinion
Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)
…Instead, Defendant reiterates its arguments regarding general jurisdiction and misconstrues Plaintiffs' arguments regarding Abex's New Jersey facility, stating that "Plaintiffs' position that Abex's research and development department in New Jersey constitutes its principal place…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)
…removal pursuant to Section 1442(a)(1). DISCUSSION I. Federal Officer Removal Jurisdiction A. Legal Standard "\[T\]he general rule that federal courts have an ever present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction. . …