No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 22, 2015

    Feaster v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)

    The court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Samuel Feaster, finding no evidence he was exposed to an asbestos-containing product made or supplied by GE. Under maritime law a plaintiff must…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · August 24, 1998 · in the opinion

    Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …Foster Wheeler Corporation; Gaf Corporation, in itself and successor to Ruberoid Corporation; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corporation; Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, in itself and as successor to UNARCO; PPG…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    Vesper v. 3M Company (2016)

    …MATTHEW P. KESSLER, MCGIVNEY & KLUGER PC. FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 3, 2015 · in the opinion

    Feaster v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)

    …about May 30, 2014, this action was removed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by Defendants Foster Wheeler Corp. and General Electric Company pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Latter v. 3M Company (2015)

    …Clark-Hurth; EATON CORPORATION, d/b/a Airflex; EMERSON ELECTRIC CORPORATION, successor to Lipe Rollway Corporation; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GKN ROCKFORD, INCORPORATED, individually and as successor to Rockford Clutch; GALION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC;…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court · March 8, 1985 · in the opinion

    Devlin v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

    … 26, provides that the general rules against claim splitting are rendered inapplicable when: (b) The court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiff's right to maintain the second action or; (f) it is…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · July 26, 1993 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …there is no common experience on which we can premise the creation of a presumption that the general public reads and heeds warnings. [\597] We can agree with defendant that the heeding presumption is not firmly…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 13, 1988

    Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. US (1988)

    …the United States under General Agency Agreements marine engineer thirteen vessels owned by five shipowner defendants, including Sea-Land 1949-1978; seaman vessels owned and/or operated for the United States under General Agency Agreements 1943…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …insufficient showing of notice of the many Saranac documents which the jury was led to believe were known to Owens-Corning which still marketed Kaylo with no warnings to the end users. As a general rule…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Thomas-Fish v. Aetna Steel Products Corp. (2019)

    …¶ 20) It is undisputed for purposes of the instant motion that Sonic Industries is not subject to general jurisdiction in the State of New Jersey. Sonic Industries is incorporated in California and maintains its principal place…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …of the videotape. See State v. Wilson, 135 N.J. 4, 17, 637 A.2d 1237 (1994) and Balian v. General Motors, 121 N.J. Super. 118, 125, 296 A.2d 317 (App.Div. 1972), certif…

  13. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 2018 · in the opinion

    Thomas-Fish v. Aetna Steel Products Corp. (2018)

    …law." Papp, 842 F.3d at 811 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). "Unlike the general removal statute, the federal officer removal statute is to be \broadly construed' in favor of a federal forum." Id. (quoting…