No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · January 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gates v. Smith Water Products Co. (2014)

    …BURNHAM CORPORATION; CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation formerly known as Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation; CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION; CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY, INC.; CRANE CO.;…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 7, 2000

    Bille v. Hedman Resources (Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation v Hedman Resources, Ltd., 2000)

    …and other makers and distributors of asbestos products in 1987 over injuries from asbestos exposure. In 1991 Bille settled with Hedman and signed a general release. At that time he had been diagnosed with pleural disease…

  7. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · December 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    In re Prudential Lines, Inc. (1992)

    …however, that Asbestosis Claimants' position misconstrues the general rules of insurance law and contractual interpretation applicable here. At the most basic level, the P & I policies that PLI purchased were yearly contracts for indemnification for losses…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · October 1, 1996 · in the opinion

    In re Waterman SS Corp. (1996)

    …on MALC. An even more persuasive basis for placing the burden of proof on MALC is the general rule that when the true facts relating to a dispute are particularly within the knowledge of one party…