17 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 14, 2017 · in the opinion
Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2017)
…Nordtrom Valves, Inc.; FLUOR DANIEL, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc.; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GARDNER DENVER INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GENUINE PARTS COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; GRIZZLY INDUSTRIAL, INC.; HENRY VOGT MACHINE COMPANY;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · August 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Lineberger v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…Erb Dean, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP & Richard T. Boyette, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P.. General Cable Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stephanie G. Flynn, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, pro hac vice & Timothy Peck, Smith Moore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…cited apply the same substantial-factor test the court had used. It noted that its later Daubert order allowed three other experts to give general causation testimony, and two of them to give specific causation testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 30, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
In response, CRA asserted the following general objections: CRA objects to the Notice to the extent that its definitions are ambiguous, vague, unduly burdensome, harassing, overly broad, and/or impose any burden beyond the discovery obligations…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · March 7, 2006 · in the opinion
Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2006)
…range of facts that may be inquired into \[on cross-examination\] is virtually unlimited except by the general requirement of relevancy and the trial judge's discretionary power to keep the examination within reasonable bounds." State…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · April 18, 2017
Lovelace v. B&r Auto Service, Inc. (2017)
…and Workers' Compensation; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Southern Truck Service, Inc.; Built Rite general automotive mechanic working on commercial fleet trucks Southern Truck Service, Inc. 1976-1980; owner and mechanic doing commercial truck repairs Built…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)
…modifications, or alterations; the likely awareness of users of the risks whether that awareness is based on warnings, general knowledge, or otherwise; design compliance with applicable government standards; extent to which labeling conformed to applicable government…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Penegar v. United Parcel Service (2018)
…employment with defendant-employer. The preponderance of the evidence in view of the entire record establishes that decedent's work for defendant-employer exposed him to a greater risk of contracting mesothelioma over the general public…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
…as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…October 14, 2020, Dr. Staggs sets forth the general principles of asbestos-related disease; discusses the studies and reports identifying a causal relationship between asbestos-containing products and diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion
Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)
…No. 20\]. The same analysis is true for the Plaintiffs' claims based on the duty to warn. As the Fourth Circuit explained in Baughman v. General Motors Corporation, 780 F.2d 1131, 1132-33 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
…publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…