No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)

    …Decedent reasonably did not know the purpose of the questioning. Perhaps Decedent could only have reasonably been expected to know of general impacts of the exposure to his health, but not that it could cause cancer…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion

    Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)

    …of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)

    …626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 19, 2009 · in the opinion

    Riedel v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2009)

    …make it into the final draft. The court stated that "while the General Assembly may well have intended all asbestos-related cancer claims to be subject to the new legislation, that intent is not clearly expressed…