15 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)
…Rimmel, for appellee Mobil Corporation. Oldham & Dowling, Reginald S. Kramer, and Terri L. Nass, for appellees General Electric Company and CBS Corporation. Trenz, McKay & Knabe Co., LPA, and Tim McKay, for appellee R.E. Kramig. Tucker…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015
Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)
…for the jury, and an expert may rely on assumed facts that independent evidence supports. Causation; Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Defiance foundry (GM Powertrain); GM Powertrain Division, Defiance facility, Defiance core…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Welsh v. Ford Motor Co. (2011)
…its first assignment of error, Ford contends that plaintiff failed to meet the initial threshold of establishing that Welsh was exposed to asbestos and had a greater risk of exposure than the general public. {¶ 27} Ford…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (2016)
…Franklin County, No. 14AP-413, 2015-Ohio-2352. Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Patsy A. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., and…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 25, 2012 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Qunicel v. Indus. Comm. (2012)
…Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, and Chelsea J. Fulton, for relator. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 11, 2015 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (2015)
…Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, and Robert A. Minor, for respondent The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Patsy A. Thomas, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. DECISION TYACK, J. {¶ 1} Robert Boyd…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 14, 2000 · in the opinion
Heard v. Conrad (2000)
…Douglas Ames, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Robert J. Marek, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Industrial Commission of Ohio. Jerome Webbs, for appellee Eichleay Corporation. WAITE, Judge. This…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2003 · in the opinion
State ex rel. Hiatt v. Indus. Comm. (2003)
…L.P.A., and W. Smith Hammelrath, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Gary E. Becker and Brian…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · July 22, 1991 · in the opinion
Lynch v. Mayfield (1991)
…Michael V. Kelley, Robert E. Sweeney and John W. Martin, for appellant. Lee Fisher, Attorney General, Robert E. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, Thompson, Meier & Dersom and Harold C. Meier, for appellees. [\57] JOHN F. CORRIGAN, Judge…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)
…the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · November 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Adkins v. GAF Corp. (1988)
…sold by ACL is processed raw asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. This fact was general knowledge in the asbestos industry in the State of Ohio at least after 1945. Not every exposure to asbestos, however…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2016)
…626, 68 S.Ct. 296. Prior to the action, Callen had executed a general release relieving the railroad company from liability for personal injuries sustained in the occurrence. Id. at 626-627, 68 S.Ct. 296…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 19, 2009 · in the opinion
Riedel v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2009)
…make it into the final draft. The court stated that "while the General Assembly may well have intended all asbestos-related cancer claims to be subject to the new legislation, that intent is not clearly expressed…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Common Pleas · January 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1987)
…developing cancer in the future. Ohio courts have not specifically addressed the issue presented here but the general policy of this state has been to permit recovery for reasonable apprehension of a potential harm flowing from…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion
Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)
…they waive any defense or bar to bringing such a suit. The State of Ohio, the Ohio Attorney General, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, and all defendants in this action agree that the statute…