19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…Wheeler, Aurora Pump, Gulf Engineering, Ingersoll Rand, Walworth, Crosby Valve, General Electric, Warren Pumps, Crane, A.W. Chesterton and Coffin Turbo Pump, and dismissed Lindstrom's claims against them with prejudice. Under maritime product liability law…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)
…Co. c/o C T Corporation System, Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Cantrell v. Adience, Inc. (2010)
…Colin G. Skinner, Oldham Kramer, 195 South Main Street, Suite 300, Akron, Ohio 44308-1314, For General Electric Co., etal., Attorneys for Appellees. Before: Gallagher, A.J., Boyle, J., and Jones, J. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Roger Bacon High School v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2011)
…Technologies, LLC, RPM, Inc., RPM International, Inc., Bondex International, Inc., C.P. Hall, Alliedsignal, 3M Company, CBS Corp., General Electric, Georgia-Pacific, Peerless, Fidelity Builders, Supply, Inc., R. E. Kramig & Co., Inc., A. W. Chesterton, McGraw…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2008 · in the opinion
Gomcsak v. US Steel Corp. (2008)
…McClelland, Attorney at Law, for Appellee. Timothy McGrail, Assistant Ohio Attorney General, for Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…2307.96, the General Assembly demanded a showing greater than an undefined contribution to a total cumulative exposure that resulted in injury. Requiring only that the plaintiff demonstrate that the exposure to asbestos from the defendant…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 26, 1989
Bush v. Abex Corp. (1989)
…a genuine issue of material fact on exposure. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Delco Moraine Division, General Motors; Delco Moraine Division, General Motors, Dayton reliability chemist Delco Moraine Division, General Motors Dayton 1962-1987
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion
Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)
…found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2023)
…(Doc. No. 89-37 at PageID\# 3403.) Parker Hannifin's General Counsel, Joseph Pophal, emailed Standard Motor's General Counsel, Carmine Broccole, writing: Parker tendered 100% of Parker's defense of the Barr case to Standard…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)
…objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review, (3) whether there is a known or potential rate of error, and (4) whether the methodology has gained general acceptance. Id. at 593-594, 113…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2020)
…not, the Court finds that an interlocutory appeal cannot be said to materially affect the outcome of the instant case. See e.g., In re General Motors LLC, 2019 WL 8403402 at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)
…Rubber & Supply Co., 117 Ohio App. 12 (7th Dist.1961). {¶31} "\[W\]hen the Ohio General Assembly enacted the current version of the \[Ohio Products Liability Act, R.C. 2307.71 et seq.\], it abrogated all…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Standard Motor Products, Inc. (2019)
…First, Standard Motors argues the Complaint should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2) because Parker Hannifin has failed to establish the existence of either general or specific jurisdiction. Assuming there…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
Connell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010)
…objects to the purported admission of answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation. Appellee did not offer into evidence, and the trial judge did not allow into evidence, any answers to interrogatories of General Motors Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)
…are deemed to have been waived, and \[the Sixth Circuit\] will review such objections only to avoid a gross miscarriage of justice. Wiley at 226 (citations omitted). As a general matter, the district judge considering a…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2020)
…tasks those employees regularly performed. Bonded Brake Program {¶ 23} To assist Flxible in starting a bonded brake business, Flxible's parent corporation, General Automotive Corporation, acquired a brake company located in Jackson, Michigan. At that time…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 12, 2009 · in the opinion
Polanco v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2009)
…However, it was a matter of general knowledge from the 1960s onward that prolonged exposure to airborne asbestos could possibly be harmful." Affidavit of Dr. Edwin Holstein stating that asbestos fibers are potentially dangerous to the…