4 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · October 22, 2008 · in the opinion
DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2008)
…Temple should receive prospective-only application. DiCenzo makes three arguments in response: (1) the general rule is that judicial decisions are applied retrospectively absent language indicating otherwise, and because Temple did not specify that it applies…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015
Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)
…for the jury, and an expert may rely on assumed facts that independent evidence supports. Causation; Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Defiance foundry (GM Powertrain); GM Powertrain Division, Defiance facility, Defiance core…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 25, 2012 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Qunicel v. Indus. Comm. (2012)
…Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County. Philip J. Fulton Law Office, and Chelsea J. Fulton, for relator. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 11, 2015 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (2015)
…Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, and Robert A. Minor, for respondent The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Patsy A. Thomas, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. DECISION TYACK, J. {¶ 1} Robert Boyd…