No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · February 2, 2018

    Coury v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …keeping the case in federal court under the federal officer removal statute for General Electric and CBS. A settlement-related email from a plaintiff's side can be an "other paper" under 28 U.S.C…

  2. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)

    …Bartells Company. With her on the brief was Graff & O'Neil. Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for cross-respondent Department of Justice, State of Oregon. Before DEITS, C.J.,\[\\] and RIGGS \[\\\] and LANDAU…

  3. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · August 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Golik v. CBS Corp. (2020)

    …Cross-Respondent, v. CBS CORPORATION, fka Viacom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, fka Westinghouse Electric Corporation, etal.; Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation; and Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc.…

  4. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)

    …in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…

  5. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 10, 2013

    Greer v. Ace Hardware Corporation (2013)

    …summary judgment, the plaintiff must produce evidence identifying a specific asbestos-containing product the defendant made or supplied and to which the plaintiff was exposed; general assertions that "some" products contained asbestos, or guesswork, are not…

  6. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    McKenzie v. AW Chesterson Co. (2016)

    …The Washington Supreme Court held that "the general rule" for common-law products liability cases that a product manufacturer has no duty "to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products," articulated…