9 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 21, 2004
Jessop v. Acf Industries, LLC (2004)
…Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka shops and rail yard; Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Topeka electrician Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka sixteen year career
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 12, 2007 · in the opinion
Donoughe v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (2007)
…485 A.2d 408, 423 n. 5 (1984), abrogated on unrelated grounds as recognized by Moroney v. General Motors Corp., 850 A.2d 629, 634-35 (Pa.Super.2004)). However, as this Court noted in Dambacher…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Hassell v. The Budd Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Lit.(no. VI), 2016)
…As amended in 1915, however, the LIA included a "general" power that "extend\[ed\] to the design, the construction, and the material of every part of the locomotive and tender and of all appurtenances." 272 U…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · February 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. (2012)
…Ante, at 1268. That is insufficient. Not every state law that "could be said to affect tangentially" matters within the regulated field is pre-empted. English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 85, 110…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Jarrett v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2018)
…Accordingly, Jarrett argues that her claim should have gone before a jury for a determination as to whether lung cancer was a "known risk" and/or whether the release was unenforceable as a general boilerplate release…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 23, 2023 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (2023)
…used for choosing those studies. Appellee's Brief at 20. According to Conrail, Nothing in \[Dr.\] Levin's report suggested that he employed any methodology to opine on general causation, much less a generally accepted one…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)
…612. The Supreme Court struck down the state law, reasoning that: \[T\]he power delegated to the \[Interstate Commerce\] Commission by the Boiler Inspection Act as amended is a general one. It extends to the design…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 4, 2013 · in the opinion
Perry v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2013)
…U.S. at 611, 47 S.Ct. 207. Congress had bestowed upon the Interstate Commerce Commission the "general" power (which now rests with the Secretary of Transportation, see Kurns, 132 S.Ct. at 1266 n. 3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
Breedlove v. CSX Transp. Corp. (2009)
…based duties have become a "semantic morass." Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 79 S.Ct. 406, 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959) (citing Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 245 F.2d 175…