No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 9, 2020 · in the opinion

    Shields v. General Electric Co. (2020)

    MARTIN SHIELDS, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., etal. Civil Action No. 18-2421. January 9, 2020. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. MARTIN SHIELDS, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DIANE L. SHIELDS, DECEASED AND MARTIN SHIELDS…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Walker v. Blackmer Pump Co. (2019)

    …were Blackmer Pump Co., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corp., Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, General Electric Company, IMO Industries, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Patterson Pump Co., Tyco International, Inc., Tyco Valves & Controls, Inc.…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2006)

    …CORPORATION, WALTER B. GALLAGHER CO., WEIL McLAIN CO., VIACOM/WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., ANCHOR PACKING CO., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., CROUSE-HINDS, DURAMETALLIC CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., HAJOCA PLUMBING CO., INGERSOLL RAND, STUDEBAKER-WORTHINGTON, INC., ZURN…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (2007)

    …Carbide Corporation, Walter B. Gallagher Co., Weil McLain Co., Viacom/Westinghouse Electric Corp., Anchor Packing Co., Combustion Engineering, Inc. Crouse-Hinds, Durametallic Corp., Garlock, Inc. General Electric Co., Hajoca Plumbing Co., Ingersoll Rand, Studebaker- Worthington, Inc…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2009)

    …CORPORATION, WALTER B. GALLAGHER CO., WEIL MCLAIN CO., VIACOM/WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., ANCHOR PACKING CO., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., CROUSE-HINDS, DURAMETALLIC CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., HAJOCA PLUMBING CO., INGERSOLL RAND, STUDEBAKER-WORTHINGTON, INC., ZURN…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Walker v. Viad Corp. (2019)

    …were Blackmer Pump Co., Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corp., Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation, General Electric Company, IMO Industries, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Patterson Pump Co., Tyco International, Inc., Tyco Valves & Controls, Inc.…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Donoughe v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (2007)

    …485 A.2d 408, 423 n. 5 (1984), abrogated on unrelated grounds as recognized by Moroney v. General Motors Corp., 850 A.2d 629, 634-35 (Pa.Super.2004)). However, as this Court noted in Dambacher…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · September 30, 1996

    Blase v. Allied Signal Inc. (1996)

    Mildred Blase sued several companies after the death of her husband, Harold Blase, an auto mechanic at Bell of Pennsylvania. She claimed that working with the defendants' products, which allegedly contained asbestos, caused his lung cancer and…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    Indeed, I believe that if the General Assembly had intended to do the opposite within the contours of a "Fair Share Act" — i.e., to maintain a liability allocation regime for strict liability cases that was…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 19, 1973 · in the opinion

    Utter et al. v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co. (1973)

    …exposed, in this industry, as he might very well be, to the common cold and that it is peculiar to the industry and not common to the general public." 203 Pa. Superior Ct. at 462, 201…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 9, 1992

    Taliferro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1992)

    …Fear of Cancer and Medical Monitoring; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Philadelphia Naval Shipyard (Philadelphia Navy Yard); Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia laborer doing general cleanup and debris removal on ships Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Philadelphia 1967-1981

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …asbestos that caused his lung cancer. However, Dr. Frank testified on this general causation factor and concluded that exposure to asbestos can cause lung cancer. Dr. Gelfand also testified that, based on the medical literature and…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    13, 68 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981) (federal law shall govern issues arising in negligence actions under LHWCA section 5(b)) with Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Atlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 272 n. 31, 99 S…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jarrett v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2018)

    …Accordingly, Jarrett argues that her claim should have gone before a jury for a determination as to whether lung cancer was a "known risk" and/or whether the release was unenforceable as a general boilerplate release…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · May 25, 1972 · in the opinion

    Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co. et al. (1972)

    …he meant asbestosis when he said asbestos exposure, as well as exceed our judicial prerogative. The General Assembly has limited recovery to death caused by asbestosis, not asbestos exposure. There is insufficient evidence upon which to…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)

    …TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)

    …280 n. 8. Moreover, because mesothelioma, in general, is so rare, "any case occurring after a well attested and substantial asbestos exposure is commonly accepted as being caused by that exposure." Id. at 283 (footnote omitted);…

  18. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion

    Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)

    …We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion

    Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. The evidentiary record…