15 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)
…Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Dana Corporation, Durabla, Durametallic Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Garlock Inc., General Electric Company, General Refractories, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green, Tweed & Company, Hajoca Plumbing Supply Company, Hercules Chemical Co.…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion
Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)
…576 (Pa. Super. 2014) (upholding the trial court's decision to enter summary judgment because the plaintiff "failed to establish that \[General Electric (GE)\] products containing asbestos were present at the worksite" and, as such, the…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · July 25, 1994 · in the opinion
Ace Robbins, Inc. v. Wcab (bullock) (1994)
…caused by two work-related exposures with two different employers. We agree that such a test is inappropriate to determine which of two employers is liable. General Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Kosinski)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…1960 Purchase Order, such indicates that General Dynamics/Electric Boat sought to purchase four (4) pieces of heat insulating block and nine (9) feet of pipe insulation from Eckel. While Plaintiffs assert that these materials were…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
… Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat and naval shipyards (Navy nuclear submarines) wife of a pipefitter who laundered his work clothes Electric Boat and naval shipyards (Navy nuclear submarines…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design Defect; The Bare-Metal Defense; Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat wife who laundered her husband's work clothes Electric Boat 1957-1975
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022
Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…or in plans, without more, is speculation and does not suffice. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Electric Boat shipyard (General Dynamics); Electric Boat, Groton wife of a pipefitter; laundered his work clothes Electric Boat Groton 1957-1970
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · March 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2018)
…4.) Specifically, Mr. Gorton performed "brake jobs, minor repairs, electrical repairs, and even pump\[ed\]...gas." (ECF No. 230-2 at 2, 5.) Mr. Gorton while employed by Olson Brothers performed "\[p\]robably a half a…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion
Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)
…of Mr. Gregg's exposure concretely, he maintains that the more general references in the testimony are circumstantial evidence that Mr. Gregg performed brake changes with asbestos-containing products from Appellant's store more frequently. Further…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)
…280 n. 8. Moreover, because mesothelioma, in general, is so rare, "any case occurring after a well attested and substantial asbestos exposure is commonly accepted as being caused by that exposure." Id. at 283 (footnote omitted);…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2011 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Salmon Bay and Gravel Co. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2011)
…testimony. Second, with regard to Dr. Brody, Plaintiffs state that he was provided no case-specific materials and offers opinions only as to general causation. (Resp. at 5.) Plaintiffs also allege that Dr. Brody did not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)
…address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)
…nature, but novel or of questionable reliability, it is necessary for the trial court to consider whether the "methodology that underlies the evidence has "general acceptance in the relevant scientific community." Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion
Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 21, 1995 · in the opinion
Baumgart v. Keene Bldg. Products Corp. (1995)
…835 (1967). However, we have long recognized an exception to this general rule which acts to toll the running of the limitations period. The discovery rule "provides that where the existence of the injury is not…