8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 27, 2017
McCarthy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
The Superior Court denied the motions for summary judgment of Warren Pumps, Gardner Denver and General Electric, ruling that the decedent's pre-suit sworn statement was admissible and that plaintiff showed enough product identification to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · January 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Mannix v. CBS Corporation (2019)
…Porter, LLP. Garlock, Inc., Defendant, represented by Craig R. Waksler, Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott, LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey M. Thomen, McCarter & English LLP & Anne E. Shannon, McCarter and English. Gould Pumps…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…government's specifications would likely have resulted in rejection of the equipment.'" O'Connell, 544 F. Supp. 2d at 55 (quoting Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F. Supp. 2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…Rule 15(a)\] is exemplified' by the words \and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" Harodite Industries, Inc. v. Warren Electric Corp., 24 A.3d 514, 530 (R.I. 2011) (quoting Medeiros v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · March 16, 2017
Stevens v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
…asbestos materials. Genuine factual disputes also barred summary judgment on the sophisticated user and government contractor defenses, and general maritime law does not bar loss of consortium damages. Failure to Warn; The Bare-Metal Defense; Sophisticated…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 9, 2011 · in the opinion
Brandt v. AW Chesterton Company (2011)
…Mr. Brandt's exposure chart names Mack and his deposition testimony, albeit not explicitly identifying Mack, confirms the general context for that exposure, Plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence of identification to reach a jury. Therefore, after…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…recognizing that "evidence of settlement negotiations is generally inadmissible under \[Rule 408\] as irrelevant and contrary to public policy"). However, the discoverability of settlement information is governed by our state's general discovery rule, Super. R…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…product; (2) on a regular basis; (3) over an extended period of time; and (4) in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002)…