10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 27, 2017
McCarthy v. Warren Pumps (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
The Superior Court denied the motions for summary judgment of Warren Pumps, Gardner Denver and General Electric, ruling that the decedent's pre-suit sworn statement was admissible and that plaintiff showed enough product identification to…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…government's specifications would likely have resulted in rejection of the equipment.'" O'Connell, 544 F. Supp. 2d at 55 (quoting Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F. Supp. 2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Burdick v. NIBCO (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
…DENVER, INC.; GOODRICH CORPORATION f/k/a THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Shannon M. O'Neil, Esq.. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Jeffrey M. Thomen, Esq.. HENRY VOGT MACHINE CO., John R. Mahoney, Esq.. INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION, f…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…Rule 15(a)\] is exemplified' by the words \and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" Harodite Industries, Inc. v. Warren Electric Corp., 24 A.3d 514, 530 (R.I. 2011) (quoting Medeiros v…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 1, 2011
Cone v. Agco Corp. (2011)
…trial. It argued first that it could not be liable for engines made before 1988, when it bought assets from a General Motors division. It argued second that it made no asbestos products after 1988. The…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · September 30, 2013
Cary v. American Optical Corporation (2013)
…Watts moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Cary conceded there was no general jurisdiction but argued for specific jurisdiction and asked for more discovery. The court found it unclear whether Watts had purposely directed…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 20, 2024 · in the opinion
Freitas v. AO Smith Water Products Corporation (2024)
…document. See Third Am. Complaint (hereinafter, Compl.). \[3\] General personal jurisdiction need not be addressed in this decision, as PBV is not incorporated in Rhode Island, nor is its principal place of business in Rhode Island…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 9, 2011 · in the opinion
Brandt v. AW Chesterton Company (2011)
…Mr. Brandt's exposure chart names Mack and his deposition testimony, albeit not explicitly identifying Mack, confirms the general context for that exposure, Plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence of identification to reach a jury. Therefore, after…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…recognizing that "evidence of settlement negotiations is generally inadmissible under \[Rule 408\] as irrelevant and contrary to public policy"). However, the discoverability of settlement information is governed by our state's general discovery rule, Super. R…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion
Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)
…product; (2) on a regular basis; (3) over an extended period of time; and (4) in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002)…