No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)

    435 S.C. 607 (2021) 869 S.E.2d 819 Beverly Dale JOLLY and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, etal., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the…

  2. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …Inc., f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc.; Fluor Daniel Services Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Goodyear Tire & Rubber; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corp., f/k/a ITT…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …Pa. July 29, 2011) (finding a duty to warn where defendant knew asbestos-containing replacement brakes would be used on its vehicles); Chicano v. General Electric Co., 2004 WL 2250990, at [\6] (E.D. Pa. 2004…

  4. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)

    …an employee of a subcontractor commissioned to install an electrical system at a plant "being constructed for \[the defendant\] by a general contractor" was not the defendant's statutory employee because his work "was not a…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · March 29, 2018

    Chesher v. 3M Company (2018)

    …specific causation expert testimony, the plaintiff must present evidence of the amount and duration of asbestos dust exposure, and general allegations of periodic exposure over many years are not enough. Causation; Expert Testimony; Maritime Law and…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)

    …t is \[\] unfair to require manufacturers of nondefective products to shoulder a burden of liability when they derived no economic benefit from the sale of the products that injured the plaintiff").\[16\] As a general matter…

  7. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · August 21, 2024 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC (2024)

    …but paid only to settle the wrongful death claim. Justice James then did exactly what the General Assembly required in subsection 15-38-50(1). He compared the "amount stipulated by the release or the covenant…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)

    …injuries, and consequently, less justification for a departure from the general rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · July 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Haskins v. 3M Company (2017)

    …tested; (2) has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) has a known or potential rate of error; and (4) has attained general acceptance in the pertinent scientific community. See id. at 593-94. In…