21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2014)
…Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; Grefco, Inc.; Henry Vogt Machine Company; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Power, Inc.; Triplex, Inc.; Ametek, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 14, 2004
In re Roc (2004)
… Expert Testimony; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station; South Texas Nuclear Power Plant workers employed at the plant Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station; workers employed at the plant South Texas Nuclear Power…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991 · in the opinion
Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)
…1969). Quantifying probability, it means a more than fifty percent chance. See Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Underwriters v. Gary Douglas Electric, 48 Ohio App.2d 319, 357 N.E.2d 388, 392 (1974). Dr. J.D. Britton…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion
Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)
…he "gets out of breath quicker." She stated that when they went walking, Mr. Morris did not take the lead. Robert and Ellois Bledsoe Robert Bledsoe is a 57-year-old electrician. On direct examination, Mr…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 14, 1996 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Wasiak (1996)
…reviewing punitive-damage awards and approved the Alabama Supreme Court's criteria, as stated in Green Oil, 539 So.2d at 223-24, and Central Alabama Electric Cooperative v. Tapley, 546 So.2d 371, 377 (Ala…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion
North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)
…909] Under Alabama law, proof of proximate causation is an essential element for both products liability and negligence claims. See Taylor v. General Motors Corp., 707 So.2d 198, 202 (Ala.1997) (products liability); Rutley v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · December 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Acevedo v. Abraham (2017)
…16-3 at p. 59);\[2\] and he once terminated an electrocardiogram ("EKG") because the nurse who was administering it did not smile at him when he asked her to (Dkt. 16-3 at p. 42).…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · January 12, 1984
Castorina v. Lykes Bros. SS Co., Inc. (1984)
…under 33 U.S.C. § 905(b) and general maritime law. He claimed injury from asbestos exposure while unloading raw asbestos in burlap bags from Lykes ships between 1965 and 1972. The bags tore and leaked…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)
…City of Austin, in which the Texas Supreme Court explained, The general rule is that when a statute is repealed without a savings clause limiting the effect of the repeal, the repeal of that statute is…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 14, 1998 · in the opinion
In re Ethyl Corp. (1998)
…184, 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995); see also Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 120 (1973) (condemning "blackmail settlements"), quoted in In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., 51 F.3d at 1298. On the other…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · January 14, 1980 · in the opinion
Mooney v. Fibreboard Corp. (1980)
…discretion to determine when it should be applied. The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion
Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)
…American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion
Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)
…to concurrently produce a single injury, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant for the entire injury. Shipp v. General Motors Corporation, 750 F.2d 418, 425-26 (5th Cir.1985). The plaintiff need only show…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 8, 1993 · in the opinion
Keene Corp. v. Rogers (1993)
…Keene does not dispute that Alabama law should control the case in general but it contends that since the appellees did not prove and the trial court did not judicially notice any Alabama law on this…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)
…accrued to him not later than 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that when the release was signed the Pecorinos did think about any exclusions or exceptions from the general, full and final release [\570] when…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores (2007)
…REV. RESPIRATORY DISEASE 363, 363-68 (1996)). One text notes that: There is general agreement from epidemiologic studies that the development of asbestosis requires heavy exposure to asbestos. . . in the range of 25 to 100 fibers…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)
…awards by holding that procedural safeguards provide all the protection that is necessary. See, e.g., Scheufler v. General Host Corp., 126 F.3d 1261, 1272 (10 th Cir.1997); Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.…